Should we not merge this in release ?

Jacques

De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Author: jonesde
> Date: Mon Sep 17 19:09:09 2007
> New Revision: 576660
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576660&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed to use BigDecimal.valueOf instead of constructor, for something 
> closer to the expected results; thanks to Jacopo and
Martin Anderson for comments on this
>
> Modified:
>     ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java
>
> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java
> URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java?rev=576660&r1=576659&r2=576660&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java 
> (original)
> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericEntity.java Mon 
> Sep 17 19:09:09 2007
> @@ -588,9 +588,9 @@
>          // NOTE: for things to generally work properly BigDecimal should 
> really be used as the java-type in the field type def
XML files
>          Object value = get(name);
>          if (value instanceof Double) {
> -            return new BigDecimal(((Double) value).doubleValue());
> +            return BigDecimal.valueOf(((Double) value).doubleValue());
>          } else {
> -            return (BigDecimal) get(name);
> +            return (BigDecimal) value;
>          }
>      }
>
>
>

Reply via email to