Re: java 1.5 feature usage question

[David E Jones]

On Oct 15, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Adam Heath wrote:

Tim Ruppert wrote:

I'm way into seeing groovy included - what's the license on that?

http://svn.codehaus.org/groovy/trunk/groovy/groovy-core/LICENSE.txt

Which mentions APL 2.0.  So, perfect.

I wrote caching implementations of janino(java), bsh, groovy,
rhino(javascript), quercus(php), and jruby(ruby), extended bsf to

any bsf changes).


free.  Locally, we can already use groovy files for services.

support faster loading(but I plan on redoing that, so it doesn't require So, ofbiz just needs better bsf integration, and you can get groovy for

-David

Yeah, that's cool Adam. This is definitely something we want in the project. I don't think we want to have any Groovy code aside from examples in OFBiz, but support for it is excellent. Basically we don't want to force people to learn a bunch of different scripting languages and other optional tools, but we certainly want to make it possible and easy to use them if that is what a group using OFBiz prefers!

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature