Thanks for comment David,

Was just wondering, I wonder now if all clients do the same...

Jacques

De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> It was probably because of my funny email client. I wrote the email  
> while on the road yesterday and clicked send and it was sitting in my  
> send queue until I connected last night. The sent time was probably  
> when I clicked send, not when it was able to connect to a mail server  
> and actually get it out on the 'net.
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Nov 4, 2007, at 1:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> 
> > Weird : I received this message only at 5h15 this morning, it was  
> > sent at 18h45 yesterday
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > De : "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> What is the broken dependency here? The CustomTimePeriod entity is
> >> defined in the framework/common component, which is one that the
> >> webtools component depends on.
> >>
> >> These definitely need to be modernized to use the form widget and
> >> such, and we should have some sort of accounting-specific time period
> >> setup screen (or screens) in the accounting manager.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 3, 2007, at 7:14 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ok got these Configuration files pulled from the applications in my
> >>> web
> >>> tools.
> >>> Was going to put them in SVN till it dawned on me that there is not
> >>> suppose to be any dependency.
> >>> now I notice the setting the Timeperiods for Fiscal is in Webtools  
> >>> and
> >>> it has it own page in Webtools.
> >>> Since this effects a application, does this not break the dependency
> >>> rule?
> >>>
> >>> So do we want to have another app in the applications that does
> >>> Setup so
> >>> there is only one pages to maintain or make seperate pages like
> >>> timeperiods in Webtools?
> >>>
> >>> The Setup would mostly be a controller that includes all the apps
> >>> controllers and a menu for selecting the setup pages throughout the
> >>> applications.
> >>> and example of a setup page is the Emails for productstores.
> >>
> >>
> 
> 

Reply via email to