I think we've had these discussions before Jacques, I'd search the mailing lists and then perhaps only continue the conversation if you have concerns about what was agreed previously.
I'm pretty sure the policy was "remove after the next release is out", and actually released, not just when a branch is cut. Regards Scott On 9 August 2017 at 23:59, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > After Nicolas's work at OFBIZ-9558 I want to create a "Code deprecation > rules" wiki page. > > Before doing so I think we need to get a consensus about when to remove > deprecated code (Java, Groovy, XML, etc.) and services definitions. > > Then we could plan to remove all deprecated code in trunk when for > instance creating a new release. > > I suggest that we don't wait too long and deprecate code when we create > the first release of the last freezed branch > > Opinions? > > Jacques > > > Le 07/08/2017 à 00:02, Scott Gray a écrit : > >> Some additional nice to haves: >> - Add a "since" attribute to the "deprecated" element that would contain >> either a date or a release candidate version string. This would make it >> easier for us to know when the service can be removed. (I can't remember >> the policy for deprecation, remove after the next release or after two?) >> - For webtools, add a strikethrough on the service name in the Service >> List >> screen and add the information to the UI in the service definition screen. >> >> Regards >> Scott >> >> On 7/08/2017 05:04, "Nicolas Malin" <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 6, 2017 8:47 AM, "Deepak Dixit" <deepak.di...@hotwaxsystems.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Nicolas, >> >>> And ideally we have to mark services deprecate instead of removing, with >>>> expected release on which we will remove this deprecated code. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> After a new ofbiz stable branche creation, we remove all deprecated >>>> service ? >>>> >>>> Any suggests, othet ideas, comments ? >>>> >>>> >
