I agree, we need to remove from the pile not add to it. Deleting is the best course of action IMHO. Heck even some of the defined services should be deleted or heavily refactored for that matter.
On Sep 1, 2017 11:33 AM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: If the services are not used, we should ask ourselves whether it would not be best to remove these to keep the code base clean. If need be these can always be brought back from the repo. Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com> OFBiz based solutions & services OEM: the unaffiliated OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Pawan, > > These services implementations were created before the Apache era. > > I suggest we simply create the corresponding definitions and test they are > OK > > Jacques > > > > Le 31/08/2017 à 19:38, Pawan Verma a écrit : > >> Hello Devs, >> >> I just walked through from *WorkEffortSimpleServices.xml* and noticed that >> some of the simple methods neither have any service definition nor used >> anywhere. Some of the examples are createWorkEffortPostalAddress, >> createWorkEffortTelecomNumber >> etc. I was expecting that it must be there. >> >> So I was just curious to know why it was not there, was it intentional? Or >> it will be done under the Minilang deprecation task going on? Please let >> me >> know if anyone has any information on it else I would be more than happy >> to >> provide a patch to get it fixed now. >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> >> *Pawan Verma* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer >> HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems >> <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> >> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part ||, Near Brilliant Convention Center, >> Indore, >> M.P, India - 452010 >> Cell phone: +91 9977705687 >> >> >
