Yes James, ITH should work. I would prefer to have ITH tightly coupled with InventoryTransfer(IT) i.e. even in case of single item transfer create corresponding entries in ITH and IT both to maintain data integrity. Also, We can try tying up Inventory Transfer with Shipment through ITH itself or a separate entity e.g., InventoryTransferShipment.
Thanks & Regards, Swapnil -----Original Message----- From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2017 9:26 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: RE: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records Hi Swapnil, Another possible solution is to have an header entity, e.g. InventoryTransferHeader (ITH), containing additional or common info related to the group transfer. For group transfer, ITH is created and each InventoryTransfer will contain a FK to ITH. For single transfer, ITH can be empty. Regards, James Yong On 2017-10-14 18:59, Swapnil Shah <swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Folks, > One very frequent use case that we encounter is that any transfer > request initiated from one facility to another is generally for > multiple products as they all need to go in a single shipment against > transfer request so as to be cost effective. > > Current schema has the limitation that any given inventory transfer > can only be for single inventory item (and hence only one product). > Would it make sense and be feasible if we enhance the existing design > such that multiple products/inventory can be tied with a single > transfer > (InventoryTransferId) request (possibly by having InventoryTransferId > + InventoryItemId as PK) and shipment is tied up with it as well. Of > course by leaving a proper audit trail via InventoryItemDetail etc. > > Let's share any further thoughts or similar business cases and then we > can try to support it if it is generic enough. > > Thanks & Regards, > Swapnil > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Yong [mailto:jamesy...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 9:36 PM > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: Re: Quantity missing for inventory transfer records > > Hi all, > > It is better to add InventoryTransferId column to Inventory Item > Detail > (IID) table so that we easily link the IID record to the Inventory > Transfer table. > > What do you think? > > Regards, > James Yong > > On 2017-10-13 23:18, "James Yong"<jamesy...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Suraj, > > > > Shouldn't the transfer detail be stored at Inventory Item Detail table? > > > > Regards, > > James Yong > > > > On 2017-10-13 16:44, Suraj Khurana <suraj.khur...@hotwaxsystems.com> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > While creating inventory transfers, a new inventory item is > > > created and successfully gets updated after completing inventory transfer. > > > As per current implementation, we don't store transferred quantity > > > anywhere in *InventoryTransfer *entity and quantity is only > > > available on the newly created inventory item. Problem is, it gets > > > deluded on time being and user won't get exact quantity for which > inventory transfer was initialized. > > > > > > IMO, we should maintain transferred quantity at *InventoryTransfer > > > *entity as well for proper history maintenance of records. > > > > > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer *HotWax > > > Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay > > > Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > > > > >
