Perhaps sharing exactly how you'd like to implement this would help.

On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 7:12 PM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to revisit this issue. Specifically on whether implementing 
> Tomcat SSO to avoid using externalLoginKey is a sound approach. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> James Yong
>
> On 2017-05-05 18:02, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been contemplating this for a while, but it is not an easy task.
>> Essentially, we need to fully refactor the Catalina Container and do a lot
>> of cleanup to reverse the way OFBiz is deployed to be a single web
>> application, not multiple web applications mapped to a single servlet
>> container as is the architecture at the moment.
>>
>> For this to happen, we need to do many things:
>> 1- Complete the refactoring of all containers to get the new signature of
>> OfbizCommand argument list
>> 2- Redesign the container so that everything is loaded once as a single
>> webapp through one master servlet. This would have the advantage of being
>> able to deploy OFBiz as a single WAR archive to be deployed in any servlet
>> container
>> 3- Redesign all components (if needed) to comply with this new architecture
>>
>> This is one of the things I've been dabbling with lately, but it's bigger
>> than I expected. The code in the catalina container is very spaghetti like
>> at the moment.
>>
>> So, I would say it's a good idea, but needs lots of cleanup / refactoring
>> work first if you want to have a good chance of succeeding in
>> implementation. Without a proper cleanup you might get a bit overwhelmed in
>> trying to navigate the code maze :) So good luck.
>>
>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose using the Single Sign On mechanism in Tomcat.
>> > Once implemented, there is no necessity for the externalLoginKey,
>> > or to indicate "intra-app" to target-type attribute.
>> >
>> > Any issue before i start working on a POC?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > James Yong
>> >
>>

Reply via email to