I'm in favor of removing, it's been there since at least 2003 and is most likely from a legacy search screen that has since been superseded.
Regards Scott On 15 November 2017 at 21:14, Suraj Khurana <[email protected] > wrote: > Thanks, Jacques and Michael for your inputs, > > I agree with both the points, either such services should be removed as > they are not being used and not written properly, or refactoring of the > whole class with proper names as per their functionality to justify their > name. > > I am willing to participate in this effort if we are more intended towards > refactoring. Please let me know how we are proceeding in this. > > I have created a Jira here > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9982>. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > *Suraj Khurana* | Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > *HotWax Commerce* by *HotWax Systems* > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78, Vijay Nagar, Indore, M.P. India 452010 > > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 14/11/2017 à 21:39, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > > >> > >> Am 14.11.17 um 19:15 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: > >> > >>> > >>> I see no reasons to drop those services if some find them useful. I get > >>> they do since someone wrote it, even with a misleading name. Not having > >>> them used OOTB is not a sufficient indication of removal. > >>> > >> I do not agree. This functionality is not used since a decade and the > >> code is in bad shape. > >> > >> I think it makes much more sense to put effort in the many other fields > >> of action we have in this project. > >> > >> Michael > >> > >> > >> > >> I can take care of renaming the methods, don't worry > > > > Jacques > > > > >
