Another option could be to replace this font by another one from Category A, like Google
"Noto Sans" or what not
But I don't know why Julien picked this font. There might be reasons to use
it...
Jacques
Le 06/04/2018 à 08:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
It's actually a category b (how did we miss it? :-o).
I have closed LEGAL-380 as duplicate of LEGAL-112
Following advice at http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
<<By attaching an appropriate and prominent label to the distribution, and requiring an explicit action by the user to get the reciprocally-licensed
source, users are less likely to be unaware of restrictions significantly different from those of the Apache License. Please include the URL to the
product's homepage in the prominent label. An appropriate and prominent label is a label the user will read while learning about the distribution -
for example in a README. Please also ensure to comply with any attribution/notice requirements in the specific license in question.>>
Since we don't use any source file, only the font binaries, it seems to me that simply adding something like for the "Crypto notice" in the
readme.adoc file should be enough
Opinions?
Jacques
Le 05/04/2018 à 20:51, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-380
Jacques
Le 05/04/2018 à 10:16, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Yes, will you do the move?
Yes, I will take care of it
Jacopo
