+1 for adding the support.

Thanks & Regards,
Devanshu Vyas.


On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:14 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Swapnil/Pierre,
> Thanks for your inputs. We can go with both promotion and price rules. I
> mean we can add support at both level, and depending upon the business
> requirement users can decide the solutions to go with.
>
> In case no one objects then will file Jira for this new feature enhancement
> and propose design for it.
>
> Best Regards,
> --
> *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> Indore,
> M.P 452010
> Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> Direct: +91-9893287847
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:57 PM Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I would consider to talk about supplier promotions, because it can also
> > involve wholesale suppliers.
> >
> > I am inclined to agree with the latest posting by Swapnil.
> >
> > Whether a supplier promotion is passed to customers is a commercial (
> > decision, and may be subject to the agreement between the internal party
> > and the supplier. But they are always intended to drive sales (from the
> > supplier to the customer, meaning purchases from the internal party to
> the
> > supplier).
> >
> > When the supplier promotion involves an internal runner (a product that
> > sells well), then the supplier promotion is often not passed down to the
> > customer.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President*
> > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer
> > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without
> privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 2:43 PM Swapnil Shah <
> > swapnil.s...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > It should be nice add. However i would have more more liked to have it
> > > supported in the form of Price Rule as well (if it isn't already).
> Many a
> > > times the mark down or mark up by manufacturers are not necessarily
> meant
> > > to be propogated as adjustment on top of the existing price to the end
> > > customer. Instead it should be directly billed at the revised prices
> from
> > > the manufacturer.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Swapnil
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:32 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Devs,
> > > > Currently promotion engine support all the discount based on party,
> > > > category, party role, party classification, shipping etc.. And
> > promotion
> > > > engine based on the condition decide that the promotion will apply
> for
> > > > customer purchase over the cart or cart item depending upon the
> action.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to propose to add support in promotion engine, so that ,
> > we
> > > > can add promotion against manufacturing party and should apply to all
> > the
> > > > products manufactured by that party.
> > > >
> > > > For example;
> > > > M1, M2 are two manufacturers.
> > > > M1P1 and M1P2 are products manufactured by M1.
> > > > M2P1 and M2P2 are products manufactured by M2.
> > > >
> > > > Now M1 gives 10% discount on all products M1, and if customer
> purchase
> > > all
> > > > products with quantity ONE.
> > > >
> > > > Assuming all items price is $100. Then CartTotal will be $400 and
> > > discount
> > > > amount will be $20. As discount is on M1 products only.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > --
> > > > *Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
> > > > HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
> > > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > > > Indore,
> > > > M.P 452010
> > > > Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*
> > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rishi-solanki-62271b7/>
> > > > Direct: +91-9893287847
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to