Hi Taher,
Are you backporting much? Since we switched to Git? Mmm OK, none. this may
explain that ;)
As I said to Nicolas:
<<I must say I'm mostly against [releasing R17] because of the surplus of
effort necessary to backport to both R17 and R18.
[...] Sincerely it's more work with Git than it was with Svn where we had
scripts for that. I'd maybe change my mind if OFBIZ-11297 would be
done... >>
Let's see what the future will tell us...
Jacques
Le 24/01/2020 à 15:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
-1
I'm not sure what is the necessity for skipping a branch.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 4:19 PM Gil Portenseigne <gil.portensei...@nereide.fr>
wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:27:15AM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi,
R16 is now an old distribution and has almost reached its end of
support. We
can soon expect a last release but we need to think about the next to be
released package
Some would prefer to release R17 before releasing R18, some would prefer
to bypass R17 release and directly publish R18 instead.
Vote:
[ +1] Do not release R17 and directly publish R18 instead.
[ -1] Release R17 before releasing R18
We had already 3 months to discuss without reaching a consensus, so this
vote will be only open for a week.
Note that it's not a formal vote to release R17 or R18, as that is
another process documented at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
Thank you for your attention
Jacques
