Hi all,

I have created a JIRA issue for it 
i.e. OFBIZ-11409: POC for Dynamic Screen Using MVVM.

Chose KnockoutJs because it uses only the data-bind attribute, instead of 
special attributes.

Regards,
James

On 2020/01/15 10:52:14, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: 
> Hi James,
> 
> I did not look into all details, but this one looks good indeed.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jacques
> 
> Le 14/01/2020 à 16:49, James Yong a écrit :
> > Hi Jacques,
> >
> > Found another JQuery friendly MVVM framework to consider:
> >   https://knockoutjs.com/.
> > Support data-binding and computed properties etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> > James
> >
> > On 2020/01/11 12:56:24, James Yong <jamesy...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Hi Jacques,
> >>
> >> Points taken.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> James
> >>
> >> On 2020/01/11 10:46:03, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>> Also jquery.x is not much maintained, last changes are from June 2015...
> >>>
> >>> Le 11/01/2020 à 11:44, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>>> Just noticed it needs Bower to install and at the moment Bowers says
> >>>>
> >>>>     "...psst! While Bower is maintained, we recommend using Yarn 
> >>>> <https://yarnpkg.com> and Webpack <https://webpack.js.org/> or Parcel
> >>>>     <https://parceljs.org/> for front-end projects read how to migrate 
> >>>> <https://bower.io/blog/2017/how-to-migrate-away-from-bower/>! "
> >>>>
> >>>> And npm warns about it
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Le 11/01/2020 à 10:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> >>>>> I remember having read about MVVM years ago, quite interesting, thanks 
> >>>>> James!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le 10/01/2020 à 16:50, James Yong a écrit :
> >>>>>> Hi Gil,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I wonder if this library helps for a start:
> >>>>>> https://github.com/joshualjohnson/jquery.x
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> James
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2019/12/13 15:52:38, Gil Portenseigne <gil.portensei...@nereide.fr> 
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Chapter One: How to manage the updating area
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After different discussions already listed by Taher [1-9], Leila,
> >>>>>>> Nicolas and me tried another approach.
> >>>>>>> Instead of analyzing how to implement different functionalities 
> >>>>>>> offered
> >>>>>>> by modern js framework, we did analyzed how end user use, in general,
> >>>>>>> OFBiz and where we, as an integrator, waste more time to create a
> >>>>>>> screen.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To help on this huge task, we set some basic rules :
> >>>>>>>       * Work only on screens supported by the theme, defined mainly 
> >>>>>>> in xml
> >>>>>>>       * This concerns only screens used for back-office applications,
> >>>>>>>         oriented to manage data
> >>>>>>>       * A developer does not have to know all of js language (or 
> >>>>>>> other)
> >>>>>>>         but can concentrate on the process/view with the end user to
> >>>>>>>         manage a data
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After a first brainstorm, we have identified three major cases :
> >>>>>>>       1. Navigation and data display
> >>>>>>>       2. View event result (data modification, calculation service, 
> >>>>>>> ...)
> >>>>>>>       3. Update an area to refresh data (after data modification)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Case 1 and 2 are easy and currently managed by OFBiz (and missing 
> >>>>>>> stuff
> >>>>>>> will be simple to add), we concentrate our attention on case 3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To update an area, we follow this pattern
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>       1. We start from a context that display different information
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>       2. That context display a submit form, use a link or another
> >>>>>>>       mechanism to call an OFBiz event
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>       3. After receiving the event return, we refresh the desired area
> >>>>>>>       with parameters that can come from origin context or from event
> >>>>>>>       return.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Currently with the screen widget, we can use within a form the element
> >>>>>>> `<on-event-update-area event-type="submit" area-id="" 
> >>>>>>> area-target=""/>`.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The problem with this use, is that your form needs to know the origin
> >>>>>>> context, to identify what are the areas to update and what are the
> >>>>>>> target to use for the refresh.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So your form needs to know where it comes from, what information need 
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> be updated in OFBiz and what will be updated after.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This increases complexity for the developer in the way that current 
> >>>>>>> form
> >>>>>>> implementation manages :
> >>>>>>>     * the data and target to communicate with the server
> >>>>>>>     * the behaviour (refreshment) to apply when receiving server 
> >>>>>>> response.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Example :
> >>>>>>>       <form name="EditPartyRoleCustomScreen" type="single" 
> >>>>>>> target="createPartyRole">
> >>>>>>>           <field name="partyId"><hidden/></field>
> >>>>>>>           <field name="roleTypeId">...
> >>>>>>>           <on-event-update-area event-type="submit" 
> >>>>>>> area-id="PartyRoles_area"
> >>>>>>> area-target="PartyRolesCustom">
> >>>>>>>               <parameter param-name="partyId" 
> >>>>>>> from-field="parameters.partyId"/>
> >>>>>>>           </on-event-update-area>
> >>>>>>>       </form>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you want to reuse the same form, you need to create another screen
> >>>>>>> with a new form to redefine the on-event-update-area (for instance
> >>>>>>> create a PartyRole).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We change the thinking, because since it is the starting context that
> >>>>>>> better knows itself, it's the starting context that will realize the
> >>>>>>> updating operation. The starting context is the screen/menu that call
> >>>>>>> this form.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In general a form is contained in a screen (classic) that is called
> >>>>>>> through a link. So we move the idea on this link :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               <link target="CreatePartyRole" 
> >>>>>>> link-type="layered-modal">
> >>>>>>>                   <parameter param-name="partyId" 
> >>>>>>> from-field="customerParty.partyId"/>
> >>>>>>>                   <update-area area-target="ResumeInfoCustomer" 
> >>>>>>> area-id="xxx">
> >>>>>>>                       <parameter param-name="partyId" 
> >>>>>>> from-field="customerParty.partyId"/>
> >>>>>>>                   </update-area>
> >>>>>>>               </link>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           And the form :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               <form name="EditPartyRole" type="single" 
> >>>>>>> target="createPartyRole">
> >>>>>>>                  <field name="partyId"><hidden/></field>
> >>>>>>>                  <field name="roleTypeId">...
> >>>>>>>               </form>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           With this logic you can define a new usage of 
> >>>>>>> createPartyRole
> >>>>>>>           without redefining a form just :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>               <link target="CreatePartyRole" 
> >>>>>>> link-type="layered-modal">
> >>>>>>>                   <parameter param-name="partyId" 
> >>>>>>> from-field="partyRelationship.partyIdTo"/>
> >>>>>>>                   <update-area area-target="MyRelationAndDetail" 
> >>>>>>> area-id="xxx">
> >>>>>>>                       <parameter param-name="partyId" 
> >>>>>>> from-field="partyRelationship.partyIdTo"/>
> >>>>>>>                       <parameter param-name="partyRelationTypeId" 
> >>>>>>> value="IRL_LIKE"/>
> >>>>>>>                   </update-area>
> >>>>>>>               </link>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After some use we identified as pro and con feedback :
> >>>>>>>       * updating form is reusable and contains only code related to 
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>         form action
> >>>>>>>       * link being in origin context, the developer knows where he is 
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>         where he wants to go
> >>>>>>>       * Menu oriented management offers a quick vision on how the 
> >>>>>>> screen will works
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>       * update-area seems to be a too technical name
> >>>>>>>       * we always have to manage area to update manually
> >>>>>>>       * too many areas to update become a headache and not only for 
> >>>>>>> the developer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We did not explain how we have done it, to try to focus the discussion
> >>>>>>> on the principles.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It would be a pleasure to have some criticism of this approach, and we
> >>>>>>> would try, in a second chapter to introduce other concepts that 
> >>>>>>> appeared
> >>>>>>> after the screens were made more dynamic and others to lowers the
> >>>>>>> identified cons.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Néréide Team
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://s.apache.org/rf94
> >>>>>>> [2] https://s.apache.org/g5zr
> >>>>>>> [3] https://s.apache.org/XpBO
> >>>>>>> [4] https://s.apache.org/YIL1
> >>>>>>> [5] https://s.apache.org/836D
> >>>>>>> [6] https://s.apache.org/DhyB
> >>>>>>> [7] https://s.apache.org/Lv9E
> >>>>>>> [8] https://s.apache.org/zKIo
> >>>>>>> [9] https://s.apache.org/D6jx
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> 

Reply via email to