+1 Thanks and regards, Aditya Sharma
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 5:09 PM Suraj Khurana <suraj.khur...@hotwax.co> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Just the very last commit on that particular line that we check while > annotating. Nothing else. As Jacques mentioned most of the time the history > can be rebuilt with blame using lines around. > > -- > Best Regards, > Suraj Khurana > SENIOR TECHNICAL CONSULTANT > mobile: +91 9669750002 > email: suraj.khur...@hotwax.co > *www.hotwax.co <http://www.hotwax.co/>* > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:43 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de> > wrote: > > > Hi Suraj, > > > > +1 for the refactoring in general. What history do we lose while > > refactoring? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael > > > > > > Am 30.05.20 um 18:25 schrieb Suraj Khurana: > > > Hello Devs, > > > > > > Hope you are doing good !! > > > > > > Currently, there are many checkstyle issues in code base which are due > to > > > formatting best practices, like indentation, using spaces before/after > > > symbols etc. > > > > > > We can solve many thousands of such issues by correcting all such > > > occurrences. Please share your thoughts on this. > > > > > > A known thing is that we will lose the last history of such codebase > > while > > > doing this re-factoring. > > > > > > Any other ideas to solve the problem are most welcome. > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > Suraj Khurana > > > Senior Technical Consultant > > > > > > > >
