Hi Jacques, Answers to your questions below.
1 - Yes, we should wait to be sure that nothing has been broken by the move to a container deployment to trunk. If/when we are happy then we can merge ofbiz-tools PR5 into master, bringing in and squashing the commits currently in the docker-experimental branch. If we discover an issue with docker-trunk we can revert. I decided to use a PR to capture the changes to make it a bit easier for folks without access to ofbiz-vm1 to review. I have seen some errors in the logs related to lack of database connections, probably due to my use of a Postgres database for the demo-trunk deployment. As I write this I realise that by using a postgres rather than the embedded Derby I have already failed in delivering a like-for-like version of demo-trunk. If wanted by the dev community, I can switch demo-trunk to use Derby, but I think it is valuable to have an external database deployment publicly visible. I will look into the errors in the logs soon. 2 - I don't have a problem with using AsciiDoc instead of Markdown, I just haven't dealt with it myself yet. Perhaps someone else could convert that file for us. :) I agree that the content in DOCKER.md is not intended to form part of the official OFBiz documentation, but I imagine in the future we might want to point potential users towards the container images as an unsupported convenience. In that case we would probably need to rework DOCKER.[md|adoc] to give appropriate deployment guidance, perhaps with separate documents to explain the container build process. 3 - Creating the ofbiz-12723 branch in apache/ofbiz-framework rather than danwatford/ofbiz-framework was an oversight on my part. I'll get it cleaned up. Thanks, Dan. On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 08:09, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > First, thanks for all your work! > > I had a quick look and Solr demo is working as expected. We are not up to > date with Solr (now 9.2.0), but that's another issue: OFBIZ-12645. > > Now, I have few questions/notes for you and the community. You mentioned > in a previous email: > Le 22/03/2023 à 17:49, Daniel Watford a écrit : > > If consensus is established, then changes shall be initially made in a way > allowing them to be quickly reversed if needed. Once the demo-trunk site is > observed as running correctly, and with refreshes applied daily, then more > permanent changes can be applied to the demo VM and changes committed > tohttps://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup accordingly. > > > 1. I guess we should now wait for at least another day before merging > the docker-experimental branch into ofbiz-tools, right? > 2. We switched from using Markdown to AsciiDoc. I just want to say > that you created > https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/trunk/DOCKER.md. I > don't think it's an issue because we don't want to expose that in the site, > it's rather for Docker users, right? > 3. (unrelated to docker effort) I guess we should remove the > https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/tree/ofbiz-12723 branch, > right? (there are more docker unrelated branches to clean, I'll send > another email for that) > > Again, thanks! > > Jacques > Le 28/03/2023 à 18:09, Daniel Watford a écrit : > > Hello, > > Per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12786, the demo-trunk site > is now hosted by a docker container running on VM ofbiz-vm1.apache.org. > > The changes to the host are captured in > PR,https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/pull/5. > > The previous approach to demo-trunk deployment patched the solr plugin to > set the solr URL to https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/solr. You can view > the patch here > -https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/blob/master/demo-backup/patch/trunk/solr.config.patch > . > > I believe I have configured the new demo-trunk container to produce the > same solr url, but by using configuration rather than source code changes. > > I don't know much about the use of Solr in OFBiz so don't know how to check > that the original demo-trunk behaviour has been maintained. > > Please could someone familiar with Solr in OFBiz take a > lookhttps://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/main and see if Solr > is operating as expected. > > Thanks, > > Dan. > > > -- Daniel Watford