Hi Jacques,

Answers to your questions below.

1 - Yes, we should wait to be sure that nothing has been broken by the move
to a container deployment to trunk. If/when we are happy then we can merge
ofbiz-tools PR5 into master, bringing in and squashing the commits
currently in the docker-experimental branch.

If we discover an issue with docker-trunk we can revert. I decided to use a
PR to capture the changes to make it a bit easier for folks without access
to ofbiz-vm1 to review.

I have seen some errors in the logs related to lack of database
connections, probably due to my use of a Postgres database for the
demo-trunk deployment. As I write this I realise that by using a postgres
rather than the embedded Derby I have already failed in delivering a
like-for-like version of demo-trunk. If wanted by the dev community, I can
switch demo-trunk to use Derby, but I think it is valuable to have an
external database deployment publicly visible.

I will look into the errors in the logs soon.


2 - I don't have a problem with using AsciiDoc instead of Markdown, I just
haven't dealt with it myself yet.

Perhaps someone else could convert that file for us. :)

I agree that the content in DOCKER.md is not intended to form part of the
official OFBiz documentation, but I imagine in the future we might want to
point potential users towards the container images as an unsupported
convenience. In that case we would probably need to rework DOCKER.[md|adoc]
to give appropriate deployment guidance, perhaps with separate documents to
explain the container build process.


3 - Creating the ofbiz-12723 branch in apache/ofbiz-framework rather than
danwatford/ofbiz-framework was an oversight on my part. I'll get it cleaned
up.

Thanks,

Dan.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 08:09, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> First, thanks for all your work!
>
> I had a quick look and Solr demo is working as expected. We are not up to
> date with Solr (now 9.2.0), but that's another issue: OFBIZ-12645.
>
> Now, I have few questions/notes for you and the community. You mentioned
> in a previous email:
> Le 22/03/2023 à 17:49, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>
> If consensus is established, then changes shall be initially made in a way
> allowing them to be quickly reversed if needed. Once the demo-trunk site is
> observed as running correctly, and with refreshes applied daily, then more
> permanent changes can be applied to the demo VM and changes committed 
> tohttps://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup accordingly.
>
>
>    1. I guess we should now wait for at least another day before merging
>    the docker-experimental branch into ofbiz-tools, right?
>    2. We switched from using Markdown to AsciiDoc. I just want to say
>    that you created
>    https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/trunk/DOCKER.md. I
>    don't think it's an issue because we don't want to expose that in the site,
>    it's rather for Docker users, right?
>    3. (unrelated to docker effort) I guess we should remove the
>    https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/tree/ofbiz-12723 branch,
>    right? (there are more docker unrelated branches to clean, I'll send
>    another email for that)
>
> Again, thanks!
>
> Jacques
> Le 28/03/2023 à 18:09, Daniel Watford a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> Per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12786, the demo-trunk site
> is now hosted by a docker container running on VM ofbiz-vm1.apache.org.
>
> The changes to the host are captured in 
> PR,https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/pull/5.
>
> The previous approach to demo-trunk deployment patched the solr plugin to
> set the solr URL to https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/solr. You can view
> the patch here 
> -https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/blob/master/demo-backup/patch/trunk/solr.config.patch
> .
>
> I believe I have configured the new demo-trunk container to produce the
> same solr url, but by using configuration rather than source code changes.
>
> I don't know much about the use of Solr in OFBiz so don't know how to check
> that the original demo-trunk behaviour has been maintained.
>
> Please could someone familiar with Solr in OFBiz take a 
> lookhttps://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr/control/main and see if Solr
> is operating as expected.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan.
>
>
>

-- 
Daniel Watford

Reply via email to