Hi Jacques,

INFRA have confirmed (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24446)
that they have not put constraints on how we securely run processes in the
VM, but have also provided some advice to help with (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12795).

I'll double check script file permissions on ofbiz-vm1, but those
permissions you mentioned seem reasonable to me.

Thanks,

Dan.

On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 10:09, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> I think that reading
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup/ofbizdocker#readme
> answered my question.
> There ofbizdocker user is taking the same role than ofbizDemo user.
>
> I though noticed that ofbizdocker has permissions 0755 on
> pull-rebuild-restart.sh, not 0775 has mentioned in
>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup/ofbizdocker#readme
>
> ofbizDemo has permissions 0764 on batch files.
>
> I guess all is OK, right?
>
> TIA
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 07/04/2023 à 19:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > I have no problems with that. BTW what about my question concerning
> "RUN-DEMOS-AS-ofbizDemo-USER-ONLY-NOT-ROOT"?
> >
> > cf. https://lists.apache.org/thread/92ylovhsh9jl9r37448s487blvzq3vfy
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 06/04/2023 à 21:25, Daniel Watford a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We recently configured the demo-trunk site (
> >> https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr) to use docker containers
> >> based on images built following commits to the ofbiz-framework trunk
> branch
> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12786)
> >>
> >> This work brought about some improvements in how containers are
> deployed,
> >> particularly regarding the disabling of specified plugins when a
> container
> >> is started up.
> >>
> >> The deployment also highlighted that memory constraints applied to the
> >> ofbiz container were too low and that there was a bug in the logic used
> to
> >> set the password for the tenant database. Both of these issues were
> quickly
> >> resolved.
> >>
> >> Through deployment of the demo-trunk site as a container, we also
> >> demonstrated how we can alter the configuration of an OFBiz instance at
> >> runtime through the use of scripts which 'hook' into various stages of
> the
> >> initialisation process. See the scripts used for demo-trunk here -
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-tools/tree/master/demo-backup/ofbizdocker/home/ofbizdocker/demo-trunk/after-config-applied.d
> >>
> >>
> >> LAZY CONSENSUS
> >>
> >> This email thread is to establish if we have a lazy consensus to
> >> automatically build and publish container images for commits to the
> >> ofbiz-framework release22.01 branch similar to what is currently
> configured
> >> for the trunk branch. These container images will have container tags
> such
> >> as release22.01-snapshot.
> >>
> >> Further, GitHub actions will also build container images in response to
> >> tags, prefixed with 'release', being pushed to the release22.01 branch.
> >> These containers will have container tags derived from the git tag. For
> >> example, git tag 'release22.01.02' would result in a container tag of
> >> '22.01.02'.
> >>
> >> This email thread is also to establish if we have lazy consensus to then
> >> use the release22.01-snapshot container images for deployment of the
> >> demo-next site (https://demo-next.ofbiz.apache.org/partymgr) similar to
> >> what is currently in place for trunk. The container tags current used
> can
> >> be seen here -
> >> https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pkgs/container/ofbiz
> >>
> >> Using a container for deployment removes the need to have any
> dependencies
> >> in place on the host OS used for the demo-next site. Dependencies are
> not
> >> an issue at the moment, but may become difficult to manage if and when
> we
> >> want to vary the JDK used to build and run release22.01.
> >>
> >> Container images produced by the GitHub Actions workflow will be
> published
> >> to the GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io). They should only be
> considered
> >> as a convenience to users who wish to use containers. Container images
> are
> >> not an official release of the Apache OFBiz project. I am not proposing
> to
> >> alter any README files to refer to the container images at this time.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Dan.
> >>
>


-- 
Daniel Watford

Reply via email to