This sounds like a good idea to me and the Entity is simple enough for me to
understand and approve, no suggestions.
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What about adding the ability to define mappings for
GlAccountTypeId-->GlAccountId, within the context of an organization,
specific for parties (or party groups/party classifications?) in a
specified role?
The idea is to define a mapping like these:
* "sales invoice transactions for the customer party id 10001 are posted
to the account id 999999"
* "sales invoice transactions for the customers with classification
'important customers' are posted to the account id 8888888"
* "purchase invoices transactions for supplier 120000 are posted to the
account 876555"
We should define a new entity (entities?), but I'm not sure about the
best layout; maybe:
PartyGlAccount:
organizationPartyId (PK)
partyId (PK)
roleTypeId (PK)
glAccountTypeId (PK)
glAccountId
Any suggestions?
Jacopo
