[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-244.
----------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
         Assignee: Scott Gray

Should be fixed in rev. 607833 although I didn't test for this specific error

> XML validation warning in UpsServices.upsRateInquire
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-244
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: framework
>            Reporter: Jacopo Cappellato
>            Assignee: Scott Gray
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: SVN trunk
>
>
> Copied from an issue in the old server from Matt Kasubaski
> I've hooked up the UPS service for ground, air, and next day, and I'm seeing 
> an error being printed to system.err when the service is used.
> Here's the error:
> [Error] :1:54: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 
> 'RatingServiceSelectionResponse'.
>  
> Here's what I've done so far looking into this to make sure it wasn't a 
> change I made to my custom version:
>  Updated my stock version of OfBiz to today's code (just in case there's been 
> a change.)
>  Modified shipment.properties for the UPS username/password so UPS will 
> correctly respond.
>  Modified the database table "product_store_shipment_meth" such that the UPS 
> methods have a service_name of "upsRateEstimate".
>  Started up Ofbiz while redirecting standard out to a file. (So I can see 
> standard error better.)
> To test:
>  Place a large widget in the cart and proceeded to checkout.
>  Once I navigated to the shipping screen, I would see the error. (One for 
> each UPS service call.)
> I spent some time digging into the code and think I found out why and the fix 
> but would like confirmation that this really is the fix.
>  
> UpsServices.upsRateInquire calls Util.XML.readXmlDocument with the validate 
> flag set to false.
> However, UtilXML.readXmlDocument has some code which doesn't look right.
> At line 220 or so, the code reads:
>         factory.setValidating(validate);
>         factory.setNamespaceAware(true);
>         factory.setAttribute("http://xml.org/sax/features/validation";, 
> Boolean.TRUE );
>         
> factory.setAttribute("http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema";, 
> Boolean.TRUE );
>  
> From what I've read about the two setAttribute values, they control XML 
> validation for the SaxParser. Since UPS doesn't have a DTD, it passes in 
> false and no DTD validation occurs because of the setValidating code. 
> However, there still is some validating going on since I am seeing error 
> messages when both are set to TRUE and no error messages when they're set to 
> FALSE. (If setValidating is set to true, a different error is displayed as 
> one would expect.)
>  
> Would this be the correct fix then, or is this turning off something that 
> needs to be there?
>         factory.setValidating(validate);
>  
>         factory.setNamespaceAware(true);
>         factory.setAttribute("http://xml.org/sax/features/validation";, new 
> Boolean(validate));
>         
> factory.setAttribute("http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema";, new 
> Boolean(validate));
>  
> As a side note when I was playing around with different combinations of which 
> of the two attributes were set to true vs false I seen some unexpected 
> behavior. According to the xml apache site, 
> http://xml.apache.org/xerces2-j/features.html#validation, if 
> xml.org/sax/features/validation is false, then no validation is done, but 
> what I was seeing was apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema has to be set 
> to false for the error to disappear.
>  
> From what I can see, everything works fine as far as getting the correct 
> results from UPS. I'm just trying to clean up errors that appear in the log.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to