Good point Scott... I was a little ahead of myself on that one. I've
removed that in SVN rev 655242.
-David
On May 10, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi David,
How would I go about replacing calls to this method? find() only
takes an
entity name.
Thanks
Scott
/** Finds GenericValues by the conditions specified in the
EntityCondition
object, the the EntityCondition javadoc for more details.
+ * NOTE 20080502: 9 references
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dynamicViewEntity The DynamicViewEntity to use for the
entity
model for this query; generally created on the fly for limited use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] whereEntityCondition The EntityCondition object that
specifies
how to constrain this query before any groupings are done (if this
is a view
entity with group-by aliases)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] havingEntityCondition The EntityCondition object that
specifies
how to constrain this query after any groupings are done (if this is
a view
entity with group-by aliases)
@@ -2203,6 +2291,7 @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] findOptions An instance of EntityFindOptions that
specifies
advanced query options. See the EntityFindOptions JavaDoc for more
details.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] EntityListIterator representing the result of the
query: NOTE
THAT THIS MUST BE CLOSED WHEN YOU ARE
* DONE WITH IT, AND DON'T LEAVE IT OPEN TOO LONG BEACUSE IT
WILL
MAINTAIN A DATABASE CONNECTION.
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use find() instead
*/
public EntityListIterator
findListIteratorByCondition(DynamicViewEntity
dynamicViewEntity, EntityCondition whereEntityCondition,
EntityCondition havingEntityCondition, Collection<String>
fieldsToSelect, List<String> orderBy, EntityFindOptions findOptions)
@@ -2229,23 +2318,42 @@
return eli;
}
