I saw it
+1 without any hesitations, choice is better
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi All (I'll assume Si isn't going to get this)
Is it correct to assume that the home phone will be the primary phone? If
we have to set one as primary wouldn't it be better to let the user decide?
Regards
Scott
2008/7/2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: sichen
Date: Tue Jul 1 14:28:09 2008
New Revision: 673216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=673216&view=rev
Log:
also make phone numbers the primary phone number
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml?rev=673216&r1=673215&r2=673216&view=diff
==============================================================================
---
ofbiz/trunk/applications/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
(original)
+++
ofbiz/trunk/applications/ecommerce/script/org/ofbiz/ecommerce/customer/CustomerEvents.xml
Tue Jul 1 14:28:09 2008
@@ -332,6 +332,8 @@
<set from-field="tempMap.partyId"
field="homePhonePurposeContext.partyId"/>
<set value="PHONE_HOME"
field="homePhonePurposeContext.contactMechPurposeTypeId"/>
<call-service service-name="createPartyContactMechPurpose"
in-map-name="homePhonePurposeContext"/>
+ <set value="PRIMARY_PHONE"
field="homePhonePurposeContext.contactMechPurposeTypeId"/>
+ <call-service service-name="createPartyContactMechPurpose"
in-map-name="homePhonePurposeContext"/>
</if-not-empty>
<!-- work phone -->
