Jacques,

I remembered a line when OFBiz was in the last stage of Incubator.
In that conversation it has been decided/declared that OFBiz will always
remain the TLP project in ASF Umbrella and in future
other Sub-Projects related to similar context can grow under OFBiz.

I liked the Rich-Text renderer option for Description and Comments.
So +1 from me on this.

--
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Indore (M.P), India
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indore



On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would like to use the same. If nobody see a problem with that I will ask
> for (OFBiz has no dependency from another TLP and should not have in
> future).
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin Cooper
> To: Marshall Schor
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Configuring our Jira comments and descriptions to use
> Rich-Text renderers?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Jira allows fields to be rendered either with a Default Text Renderer or
>  a rich-text renderer (the Atlassian Wiki Renderer).  Info here:
>  http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/v3.12/configurerenderers.html
>
> If you've read that page, you're no doubt aware of the possible issues with
> having different renderers for different projects. If UIMA is expected to
> become its own TLP, that's probably no big deal. If it expects to land under
> a different TLP, you probably want to ensure that both the TLP and UIMA use
> the same renderer, whichever renderer that might be.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
>
>
>  Some Apache projects have the rich text renderer enabled; see for example:
>  https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-186
>
>  Can someone with sufficient karma alter our project (Apache UIMA) setup
>  for Jira to use the rich-text renderer, at least for the description and
>  comment fields?  I am an "administrator" of our Project Jira, but don't
>  have sufficient karma for this.
>
>  -Marshall
>
>
>

Reply via email to