I created a Home application for my employer. The Home page has a link to
create a new OFBiz user account so that new employees can create their own
account.
A new user is given some basic permissions. Their Home page allows them to set
preferences, update their profile, and send and receive communications. All new
users also have access to the calendar application and the company forums.
I hoped the MyPage component could be used for that, but it went off into
another direction. I asked Hans if we could keep MyPage generic enough for new
users to use, but I wasn't successful.
I could contribute some of my Home page work to the project (in fact, the
calendar work I'm doing right now is part of that) but we need a place for it
to land.
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 10/5/08, Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile
> screen)
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Sunday, October 5, 2008, 2:05 AM
> David,
> I found in the ML some citations of the Apache Pluto
> project that is JSR 168
> compliant. May be this is what you are referring to.
> It would be really nice to have the MyPage application
> rolled out using this
> kind of tecnology but I am actually too far from having a
> clear idea of the
> efforts required to do it.
>
> However I propose to spend some time discussing and
> collecting requirement
> specifications for an application that I feel missing into
> OFBiz OOTB and
> that, may be, is something near to what MyPage seems trying
> to be.
>
> I would call the missing application simply
> "Home".
>
> - The main purpose of the Home application would be to have
> a "solid" access
> point to OFBiz that is always accessible to every user.
> - From this application the user should be able to access
> all applications
> he has permission to.
> - Should be directly able (without accessing any other
> application) to
> change his profile and user preferences.
> - Should be able to create and configure as many
> "dashboard" pages as he
> likes. And on every page should be able to put screenlets
> elements defined
> by all installed applications. These features extends what
> is actually
> implemented in MyPage application and, in my opinion, gives
> a great value to
> the entire OFBiz system. (I would use JIRA as a model)
>
> You already said that this kind of things are well
> implemented into JRS 168
> compliant portals but may be it would be better to start
> defining common
> agreed specifications (we could have a JIRA for this) and
> then, before
> starting working, decide if doing it with external
> tecnologies (like Pluto
> for instance) or improving and giving more generality to
> the actual MyPage
> application using the OFBiz screenlets.
>
> I hope to hear from you all something about that.
>
> Many thanks,
> -Bruno
>
>
> 2008/8/15 David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> > While it wouldn't make sense for most of OFBiz,
> for the MyPage stuff a
> > portal framework would be really valuable. Many of the
> things you
> > describe here are basically what a portal framework
> does (ie the JSR 168
> > type of stuff). Other things would have to be added on
> to make things
> > happen automatically based on other stuff in OFBiz, ie
> some integration
> > stuff, but it might be a good idea. There is even a
> decent little portal
> > that is an Apache project...
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:41 +0200, Bruno Busco wrote:
> > > Thinking more about this may be the same concept
> of pluggability could be
> > > used in the MyPage component.
> > > Every application could register in some way
> several own screens that
> > will
> > > then all available to the user in the MyPage.
> > > Using the enable/disable checkboxes the user coud
> configure its "MyPage"
> > > picking up things from applications in an
> application-driven way.
> > > -Bruno
> > >
> > > 2008/8/15 Bruno Busco
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > while writing the compact header we had to
> define which links to have
> > > > available to the user in the compact header
> itself.
> > > > The "profile" link would seem to
> be a good candidate (quite standard)
> > but,
> > > > since the viewprofile page is now external
> to the framework, this
> > offers the
> > > > occasion to think about the viewprofile and
> the preference page itself.
> > > >
> > > > I have the idea that the profile/preference
> page could be pluggable.
> > > > It is quite common that new components have
> some new preferences to
> > offer
> > > > to the user.
> > > > Having the profile/preference page pluggable
> we could let other
> > > > applications to add their specific elements
> to the standard preference
> > pages
> > > > content.
> > > >
> > > > The standard "preference" page,
> defined in the framework, should let
> > the
> > > > user to change his name, e-mail, password,
> locale language, timezone,
> > > > VisualTheme etc.
> > > > Additional applications-defined preferences
> will be added (in a way to
> > be
> > > > defined) and shown to the user in the same
> page of the standard
> > preferences
> > > > or the like.
> > > > A possible way to plug application-specific
> preferences could be that
> > > > application "registers" its own
> preferences pages adding the path to
> > locally
> > > > defined preferences screen into a globally
> framework-defined array.
> > > > This array could be used by the framework
> preference page to populate a
> > > > TabBarMenu so that all applications
> preferences will be available at
> > one
> > > > place.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about?
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Bruno
> > > >
> >
> >
