svn 709126
I had to fix my main build.xml since it was merged.
after downloading the build from the svn.
ant clean
ant build
BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 1 minute 56 seconds

Ray sent the following on 10/30/2008 2:39 AM:
> Since my last post on this including suggested fixes that I tested and
> had working on Java 1.5 & 1.6 using internal OFBiz ant I was able to get
> on with stuff. Personally I didn't test those on my Ubuntu machine as it
> was already working and I felt it was more an issue with OFBiz build
> files not including enough jars and paths etc. so adding those was not
> likely to break the Ubuntu machine.
> 
> This morning though with a clean check out from SVN on my Ubuntu machine
> it doesn't work now!!! Can't test XP machine as not available at the moment!
> 
> BUILD FAILED
> ofbiz_svn_clean_test/build.xml:106: The following error occurred while
> executing this line:
> ofbiz_svn_clean_test/specialpurpose/build.xml:22: The following error
> occurred while executing this line:
> ofbiz_svn_clean_test/macros.xml:63: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/bsf/BSFException
> 
> Am I alone or is this still an issue?
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> Adam Heath wrote:
>> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>> Still getting this:
>>>
>>> BUILD FAILED
>>> /demo/deployments/demo.hotwaxmedia.com/build.xml:106: The following
>>> error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /demo/deployments/demo.hotwaxmedia.com/specialpurpose/build.xml:22: The
>>> following error occurred while executing this line:
>>> /demo/deployments/demo.hotwaxmedia.com/macros.xml:58: Could not create
>>> type scriptdef due to java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>> org/apache/bsf/BSFException
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Adam, we either need to remove whatever is causing this and put
>>> something in place to ensure that we don't bank on using ./ant or
>>> ./ant.bat - or help me come up with a better process.  This has been
>>> working with the current process for a number of months and now it's
>>> busted (which just means the current stuff is not available to the
>>> community).
>> Got a better one, not modifying global ant, not adding any additional
>> load-time stuff to ./ant.  Am about to test in a chroot.
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to