I agree,
this will let the Example application to be a demonstration for both the
menu widget based AppBar and the dynamic portal pages.

-Bruno

2009/2/4 Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>

> Bruno, Hans,
>
> thanks for the info and insight... well I see two different interesting
> items in this:
>
> a) enhancing the Menu Widget to support dynamically retrieved menu items
> (as you propose)
> b) having the Example application document the most common best practices
>
> What I am suggesting is to:
>
> 1) move the example of a dynamic menu of the Example application to a
> specific screen (out of the decorator)
> 2) take some time to study and design the proper extensions for the menu
> widget and then convert the ftl file
>
> The reason for #1 is that, even if having an example of a dynamic menu is
> great, it is not still the most common way of rendering menus in OFBiz, and
> this could cause some confusion to new developers that are exploring the
> Example application.
>
> Does it make sense?
>
> Jacopo
>
>
>
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>
>  Hi Jacopo.
>>
>> I completely agree with you and perhaps you can help here? The thing we
>> can do in ftl and not in a menu is the processing of a list of buttons.
>>
>> If there could be a iterate function in a menu (similar to a <#list in
>> ftl) to list the buttons from a list, then sure we can use a menu
>> again.....
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hans
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 12:36 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> due to recent work on the Portal now the Example application is
>>> rendering the top menu using an ftl template and not as a Menu widget
>>> definition (as it was previously, if I am not wrong).
>>> Is there a reason for the switch (sorry but I still don't know much
>>> about the Portal framework)?
>>> I think the Example application should demonstrate all our best
>>> practices, and using menu widget is one of them.
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.antwebsystems.com :
>> Quality OFBiz support for competitive rates....
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to