Hi Ruth,
please give a look here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1999

HTH, Bruno

2009/10/18 Ruth Hoffman <rhoff...@aesolves.com>:
> Hi Bruno:
> Pardon my ignorance, but I was wondering, is there a functional
> specification or requirements document covering the myportal design? I'm
> trying to follow the JIRA comments and am getting very confused as to the
> original requirements that drove the development of this code.
>
> TIA
> Ruth
>
> Bruno Busco (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>>    [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12767111#action_12767111
>> ]
>> Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-2129:
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> My ideal ofbiz framework-only installation, from a user point of view, is
>> as follows:
>>
>> 1 - admin can create users and let them log in
>> 2 - admin can assign to each user a set of permissions
>> 3 - users can login, access the home application and customize their
>> default portal page
>> 4 - users can select a different theme among what admin has installed
>> 5 - users can change their details as name email etc.
>> 6 - users can ask for a forgotten passord and receive by email
>> 7 - users (if given the permission) are able to send communications to
>> othe users
>> 8 - users can receive and read communications
>>
>> All other features should be activated installing the application.
>> Having this approach I think that OFBiz will be used by many users that
>> (like me) are not strictly interested in a businness system based on selling
>> products but simply in a framework to build powerfull enterprise level
>> automated web applications.
>>
>> Should we better focus on having the framework isolated?
>> The home application and the portal system should let us do this more
>> easily.
>> Any time I start studying how to definitively remove the applications from
>> the installation I stop on the party component.
>> My idea is that the party component should be reviewed in order to split
>> the framework from the whole. It seems to me that it is too much linked to
>> applications but also implementing base functionality that should be
>> available in the framework-only.
>>
>> Any idea on how to proceed on this?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Moving definitively from MyPage to MyPortal / Home
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>                Key: OFBIZ-2129
>>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2129
>>>            Project: OFBiz
>>>         Issue Type: Improvement
>>>         Components: specialpurpose/myportal
>>>   Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>>>           Reporter: Bruno Busco
>>>            Fix For: Release Branch 9.04
>>>
>>>
>>> The MyPage application should be deleted if all functionality have been
>>> moved to MyPortal.
>>> Moreover I would suggest to do the following:
>>> 1) Move all screenlets that are now defined in MyPortal but are strictly
>>> related to other applications (i.e. projectmgr) to their respective
>>> applications.
>>> 2) Rename the MyPortal to Home application, have it mounted on "/" and
>>> (may be later) move it to the framework when no dependency to the
>>> applications are left
>>> 3) For the new functionalities that have been developed in
>>> MyPage/MyPortal (i.e. communications) we should think where to place them
>>> 4) The actual way of integrate the new portalPages into the AppBarMenu is
>>> not compatible with the Widget version of the AppBarMenu (in the Example
>>> application the AppBarMenu has been reverted to the .FTL version just for
>>> this reason). I think we should find a way to integrate the PortalPages to
>>> the Widget version of the AppBar.
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to