Your current relationship definition is attempting to tell the entity engine that PostalAddress.geoPointId points to many GeoPoints which obviously isn't possible since GeoPoint.geoPointId is that primary key.
I still the think relationship name is not following best practices. As Erwan pointed out in the jira issue, a relationship title is typically only used when there a multiple relationships to the same entity as a means to distinguish those relationships. PointGeoPoint has no meaning and would be better as simply GeoPoint.
Regards Scott On 6/11/2009, at 11:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Scott, Inline.. From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com>Hi Jacques,Have you tested this? Changing the relationship from one to many implies that there is a contactMechId on the GeoPoint entity but that isn't the case right?Why would we need contactMechId on GeoPoint ? The relation is established through geoPointId and that's enough. Same for Facility.> Also was it your intention that the relationship name now becomesPointGeoPoint?Erwan did not like to call getRelated("Geo pointGeoPoint"), and I agree it's not beautiful, even if it works (see Jira for more...).JacquesRegards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 6/11/2009, at 7:26 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:Author: jleroux Date: Thu Nov 5 18:26:27 2009 New Revision: 833113 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=833113&view=rev Log: Change "Geo Point" title to "Point"Change the type of relation for Postal Address to GeoPoint from one to many. Because of the elevation field in GeoPoint. A bit scifi for now, but maybe useful one day...) Thanks to a discussion with Erwan "Relation title not needed on Facility entity" at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ OFBIZ-3153 - OFBIZ-3153Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=833113&r1=833112&r2=833113&view=diff= = = = = = = = = = ==================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Thu Nov 5 18:26:27 2009@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@<relation type="one" fk-name="POST_ADDR_PCGEO" title="PostalCode" rel-entity-name="Geo"> <key-map field-name="postalCodeGeoId" rel-field- name="geoId"/></relation>- <relation type="one" fk-name="POST_ADDR_GEOPT" title="Geo Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"> + <relation type="many" fk-name="POST_ADDR_GEOPT" title="Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"> <!-- because of the elevation field in GeoPoint we may face a many relationship in future --><key-map field-name="geoPointId"/> </relation> <index name="ADDRESS1_IDX"> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=833113&r1=833112&r2=833113&view=diff= = = = = = = = = = ==================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Thu Nov 5 18:26:27 2009@@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ <relation type="many" rel-entity-name="FacilityTypeAttr"> <key-map field-name="facilityTypeId"/> </relation>- <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT" title="Geo Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"> + <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT" title="Point" rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"><key-map field-name="geoPointId"/> </relation> </entity>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
