+1 for moving he screen down to make space as in the old scheme......
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 11:36 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
> > Adrian Crum wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
> >>> What about having both versions together: the message will disappear
> >>> after sometime (as it was before) but you can still click on it for
> >>> faster closing?
> >>>
> >>> An improvement would be to add a [x] sign at the message corner, so
> >>> users guess that it can be clicked and closed.
> >
> > While we're on the subject, please add a way to see the message after
> > it goes away. Consider the case of a request taking a long time, so
> > the user changes focus to a new window. Then, when they come back,
> > the window gets clicked, and the message goes away, never to be seen
> > again.
> >
>
> This is why I like the "old" way better where the message pushes everything
> down instead of sitting on top and going away (especially automatically).
>
> The dropping crumbs theme also uses displacement instead of overlay and
> disappear, and IMO that's a plus to it.
>
> -David
>
--
Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
