Are you asking me to make a decision?

I think the answer is obvious... (ie yes), but why are you asking me about it?

-David


On Jan 31, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> Hi David,
> 
> i would be more service oriented to the OFBiz users. However if you want
> to go the route explained below, shouldn't there be some message on the
> ofbiz website?
> 
> Regards,
> Hans
> 
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:15 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
>> Well, now both ofbiz folks and infra folks have more of an incentive to get 
>> it done.
>> 
>> It's not going to kill the project to go without a demo site and certain 
>> other resources for a little while. On the other hand, it IS going to get 
>> people moving if there is no fallback and the new ASF infra resources are 
>> the only way forward.
>> 
>> So no, I personally don't want to see any other temporary solutions.
>> 
>> -David
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi David
>>> 
>>> to fix this quickly this is the only way
>>> 
>>> i have a request outstanding with infra for 2 subdomainnames and 2
>>> certificates now for 2 months....
>>> 
>>> Hans
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 18:16 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
>>>> Do we really want to do this? It's not really a permanent solution, and on 
>>>> a demo site I don't think people will be too freaked out by certificate 
>>>> warnings (though obviously that's just a guess/opinion).
>>>> 
>>>> BTW, also moving this one to the dev list since it is a project related 
>>>> topic and not related to the use of OFBiz.
>>>> 
>>>> -David
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> To get this working quickly again....
>>>>> 
>>>>> can you give us the ssl certificates for 
>>>>> demo.ofbiz.org
>>>>> demo904.ofbiz.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> and point changing the dns for both domains to : 140.211.11.41
>>>>> 
>>>>> when we get a second ip we need to change the second one again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Hans
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>>>>>> I'll be happy to get these redirects in place this evening - can't say  
>>>>>> I didn't tell everyone that it was coming ...  More to come tonite -  
>>>>>> we need to remove the usage of ofbiz going forward since this is all  
>>>>>> apache now.  That is what everyone wanted right.  The redirects will  
>>>>>> remain in place for a bit - but kong term this will go away since it's  
>>>>>> not official.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If my understanding is incorrect on any of these points let me know.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Ruppert
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>>>> HotWax Media
>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Hans Bakker  
>>>>>> <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just got this back from infra:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We have shut down our VM host nyx, in order to try a firmware  
>>>>>>>> upgrade on the
>>>>>>>> array.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> So Hudson-win.apache.org, ofbiz-vm.apache.org and some buildbot  
>>>>>>>> slaves are
>>>>>>>> all down currently. I'll get them back up as soon as possible,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> so they are working on it...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 04:26 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote:
>>>>>>>> I asked infrastructure to look at the ofbiz-vm.apache.org.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> very strange because it was running one hour ago...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 09:10 -0800, BJ Freeman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> returns to main page when clicked.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
> 

Reply via email to