Adam Heath wrote: > Actually, not exactly that. > > FacilityContentType is just a ContentType, you don't need to create > the sub-table. > I suppose to extend on my earlier message... I'm a little confused why xxxx_content_type isn't called xxxx_content_purpose. The content already has a "type" from the content_type table that is specified in the content table. The association of the content with a given entity seems more like it has a purpose, it doesn't change the base type of the content. Right?
-- Ean Schuessler, CTO e...@brainfood.com 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
