Adam Heath wrote: > Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> while taking a new look to code coverage, will it be hard to use emma >> instead of cobertura ? >> In this case, we could include the library to OFBiz, as it is under a >> CPL license. > > Not super hard, no; I wrote the interface to be extensible with other > tools.
I'm looking at it's sample reports, and I like cobertura's better. I don't know if it is the same data, tho. I'll look into adding support for it.
