Hi Bruno, that's similar to the approach I followed this morning. I
commented out all the applicants and specialpurpose. I then followed the
procedure I documented in the wiki for creaking a stanalone framework
based on release 10.04. I then uncommented content and proceded to move
all the entity items that content required from party to partycore. These
are :
>>>> Party, PartyAttribute, PartyTypeAttr, PartyGroup,
>>>> PartyType,
>>>> PartyRole, RoleType, Person
I then commented ou the references to order in the content survey tables
and started ofbiz.
I was thinking that if we could decide which entities should go in core,
we can then figure out what to do with the application code.
I know it's unlikely, but it would be great to have the 10.04 available as
a standalone framework!
Cheers,
Chris
> Hi Chris,
> first of all I want thank you for the effort spent on this subject.
> Some time ago I approached this issue in another way:
> I tryed to build an OFBiz with only the framework, the content and the
> party applications.
> Actually what I did was a change to the data model only.
> I have a patch that changes the data model so that all dependencies in
> the data model are removed. I moved some entities from an application
> to another and extended some entity from others.
>
> Please note that only the data model has been changed and not the
> application code. So it is not a working OFBiz but I think it could be
> good to see what I discovered to be done.
>
> I will create a new JIRA and attach the patch.
>
> -Bruno
>
> 2010/2/24 Christopher Snow <sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk>:
>> Hi Jacopo,
>>
>> I will try and identify exactly which entities would be required in
>> content,
>> and those required in contentext. In the meantime, would you agree with
>> the
>> following list?
>>
>> Component CONTENT
>>
>> view AssocRevisionItemView
>> view ContentAssocRevisionItemView
>> view MaxRevisionItemView
>> view MaxContentApprovalView
>> view ContentAssocOptViewFrom
>> view ContentRevisionItemAndContentApprovalView
>>
>> entity Content
>> view ContentAndRole
>> entity ContentApproval
>> entity ContentAssoc
>> view ContentAssocDataResourceViewFrom
>> view ContentAssocDataResourceViewTo
>> entity ContentAssocPredicate
>> view ContentAssocViewFrom
>> view ContentAssocViewTo
>> entity ContentAttribute
>> view ContentDataResourceView
>> entity ContentMetaData
>> entity ContentOperation
>> entity ContentPurpose
>> entity ContentPurposeOperation
>> entity ContentPurposeType
>> entity ContentRevision
>> entity ContentRevisionItem
>> entity ContentRole
>> entity ContentType
>> entity ContentTypeAttr
>> view SubContentDataResourceView
>>
>> entity AudioDataResource
>> entity CharacterSet
>> entity DataCategory
>> entity DataResource
>> entity DataResourceAttribute
>> view DataResourceContentView
>> entity DataResourceMetaData
>> entity DataResourcePurpose
>> entity DataResourceRole
>> entity DataResourceType
>> entity DataResourceTypeAttr
>> entity DataTemplateType
>> entity ElectronicText
>> entity FileExtension
>> entity ImageDataResource
>> entity MetaDataPredicate
>> entity MimeType
>> entity MimeTypeHtmlTemplate
>> entity OtherDataResource
>> entity VideoDataResource
>>
>> entity Document
>> entity DocumentAttribute
>> entity DocumentType
>> entity DocumentTypeAttr
>>
>> entity WebPreferenceType
>> entity WebUserPreference
>>
>> extend-entity WebPage
>> entity WebSiteContent
>> view WebSiteAndContent
>> entity WebSiteContentType
>> entity WebSitePathAlias
>> entity WebSitePublishPoint
>> entity WebSiteRole
>> view ContentAssocAndContentPurpose
>>
>> Component CONTENTEXT
>>
>> entity Survey
>> entity SurveyApplType
>> entity SurveyMultiResp
>> entity SurveyMultiRespColumn
>> entity SurveyPage
>> entity SurveyQuestion
>> view SurveyQuestionAndAppl
>> entity SurveyQuestionAppl
>> entity SurveyQuestionCategory
>> entity SurveyQuestionOption
>> entity SurveyQuestionType
>> entity SurveyResponse
>> view SurveyResponseAndAnswer
>> entity SurveyResponseAnswer
>> entity SurveyTrigger
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> thanks for your report:
>>>
>>> On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> With "help" dependent on content, I believe content should be moved
>>>> into
>>>> the framework.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> IMO the content should be split into two parts: one will go into the
>>> framework, the other one ("contentext") will stay in the applications
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One of the main dependencies in content is from survey to order. One
>>>> option is to remove survey into it's own dedicated component. Any
>>>> thoughts
>>>> on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> This could be a good candidate for the "contentext" component I have
>>> mentioned before.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The other main dependency is on party. I believe we should move the
>>>> core
>>>> party stuff (Party, PartyAttribute, PartyTypeAttr, PartyGroup,
>>>> PartyType,
>>>> PartyRole, RoleType) into a partycore component that is part of the
>>>> framework. Any thoughts on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I still think (and hope) that the framework will be able to live
>>> without
>>> dependencies on Party; we should carefully evaluate the current
>>> dependencies
>>> and see if we can resolve them.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Content also has a dependency on Person via WebSiteRole. I'm not sure
>>>> Person should become part of partycore. However, I'm not sure that
>>>> Person
>>>> should be part of WebSiteRole. Any thoughts on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The dependency on Person should be removed from the data model: this
>>> should be a simple task to perform.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Chris Snow - CEng MBCS CITP MBA (Tech Mgmt) (Open) CISSP
Tel: 01453 890660
Mob: 07944 880950
Www: www.snowconsulting.co.uk
