--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Adrian Crum <[email protected]> wrote: > Consistent random foreign key violations. Two records would > get the same sequence number. Random in that different > entities would be affected each time, and consistent in that > it happens nearly every time. > > Try running five or more threads against it on a > multi-processor machine.
Oops, maybe those were primary key violations. Bottom line is, an exception was
thrown because two records got the same sequence ID.
