The problem with this approach is that it supposes the same set of functionnalities And it's not the case for 9.04, 10.04(5?) and trunk.
Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <bjf...@free-man.net>
With the focus on stability as defined by software life cycle That being that once a module had been touched, till it has had rigorous testing, it is not considered stable, I would like to propose a release life cycle similar to this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_release_life_cycle trunk would be pre-alpha 9.04 beta 10.4 would be alpha. A vote would by those directly involve with each one. The problem is what would constitute rigorous testing, to certify that code to move to the next level.. This would alleviate misunderstanding about what Release and RTM means. Yes I am trying to get away from the No compile errors means stable code. Also what the design scope and goal is. ========================= BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation <http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=93> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man Linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
