On 23/03/2010, at 9:46 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 23/03/2010, at 9:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> This seems important, could you explain how it works a little more? >>> There was a thread about this recently, where I announced which >>> classes had full coverage. This annotation just means that the >>> person(s) listed in the annotation are monitoring the source. That >>> means that those people might be who to turn too if there are >>> questions on how the code works. >> >> But what does it do functionally? How would it be different from: >> // "Don't mess up my code buddy!" signed Adam Heath > > Shows up in javadoc.
Got it > > The retention policy could be changed to to Runtime, so that a test > case that fails could report something automatically. Doesn't buildbot do that for us already? > Remember, annotations are easier to access programatically. My only concern is that we removed all author information when we moved to Apache and this feels very similar to it. I understand you're not claiming authorship but it does feel kind of implied.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
