Adam Heath-2 wrote: > > Your use of Resolved is not correct. I reference > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ShowConstantsHelp.jspa?decorator=popup#StatusTypes. > > Looking at that page, there doesn't seem to be a way for submitted to > be involved in the workflow whatsoever, beyond the initial creation. >
If the use of Resolved is incorrect, that is fine. My terming of a "contributor" vs. a "non-contributor" may be incorrect as well. Would you consider anyone in the community that provides code a contributor or would that be reserved for people with "commit" privilege? In either case, there are a variety of existing JIRA statuses that could be added to the Ofbiz project to resolve this issue. The one that lines up with my initial thinking seems to be "Ready To Review" which would seem to reflect what the commiter would be doing (but a different status may make sense). Again, having another status here would help me (as someone that can not commit but is trying to provide code back to the project) and I would suspect it may help commiters more intelligently plow through the backlog of available patches. Wadaya think? -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Use-of-JIRA-Resolved-status-tp1747129p1747306.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
