On 5/04/2010, at 5:11 PM, Adam Heath wrote:

> doo...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: doogie
>> Date: Sun Apr  4 19:08:46 2010
>> New Revision: 930737
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930737&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make use of UtilObject.equalsHelper in storeAll.
>> 
>> Modified:
>>    ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java
>> 
>> Modified: 
>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java
>> URL: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java?rev=930737&r1=930736&r2=930737&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java 
>> (original)
>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/GenericDelegator.java 
>> Sun Apr  4 19:08:46 2010
>> @@ -1450,7 +1450,7 @@ public class GenericDelegator implements
>>                         if (value.containsKey(fieldName)) {
>>                             Object fieldValue = value.get(fieldName);
>>                             Object oldValue = existing.get(fieldName);
>> -                            if ((fieldValue == null && oldValue != null) || 
>> (fieldValue != null && !fieldValue.equals(oldValue))) {
>> +                            if (UtilObject.equalsHelper(oldValue, 
>> fieldValue)) {
>>                                 toStore.put(fieldName, fieldValue);
>>                                 atLeastOneField = true;
>>                             }
> 
> Did anyone else review this commit?  Or did you not understand the code?
> 
> Yes, I screwed it up.  But if no one reviews the commits, then how
> will much bigger problems be found?  This was a simple problem to
> find, an obvious inverted test, yet no one noticed it.
> 
> What's the point of having commits mailed to the list if no one will
> review them?

Try to avoid dumping 10-20 commits at a time and I'll try to avoid skimming 
over them.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to