Bob Morley wrote: > > Adrian Crum-2 wrote: >> As an OFBiz user, it seems to me you would have a vested interest in >> reviewing commits. >> > > Agreed. Our fundamental problem (and this is definitely our problem) is > that we branched off pretty badly and as a result, have not merged Ofbiz > trunk in a LONG time. So while we do have a vested interest in these > commits and the longevity of Ofbiz in general, they are longer term then > they should be.
We recently switched to using git to manage our debian package of ofbiz. Then, after 6 months, I did an upgrade to a newer snapshot. It took me just half a day to do that. I'm currently maintaining a single version of webslinger, that installs into 595296, 811564, and 902021. I am also maintaining all those ofbiz versions. The latter 2 are maintained in git. It's been my policy to only put things in the package that first get added to trunk. This makes cherry-picking simpler, and, when I eventually upgrade, I can throw away all the old versions, and just go to trunk. I can also push the local branch into our internal git, then do a checkout on production if I need to do some special fixes or production.
