+1
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:23 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Back on this,
>
> Should we not be realistic and for marketing purpose simply have the home
> page translated (and possibly shown accordingly to
> language used)?
> It it really a big deal for our users?
>
> Thanks for your opinions (if any ;o)
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
> > BTW, it would be a very good mean to have all languages in svn repo!
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> Inline...
> >>
> >> From: "Hans Bakker" <[email protected]>
> >>> Hi Jacques.
> >>>
> >>> there are several reasons why i think it should be part of the
> >>> distribution:
> >>>
> >>> 1. It would be maintained much better because it is the same as changing
> >>> a program.
> >>
> >> If you use https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site it's as easy as
> >> having it embedded.
> >>
> >>> 2. the ofbiz site should replace the cmssite and then have a perfect
> >>> demo of OFBiz CMS capabilities.
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree that would be a plus if done right (ie easily customisable,
> >> not only an inner HTML content)
> >>
> >>> 3. concerning the demo site, i think that should be as reliable as the
> >>> website....
> >>
> >> Mmm, should be...
> >>
> >>> 4 eat our own dogfood.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> It is on my list to convert the current site and i plan to do that in
> >>> the next 4 weeks.
> >>>
> >>> we mostly did it already, have a look at ofbiz.in.th which runs on ofbiz
> >>> and is VERY reliable.
> >>
> >> Indeed, that's solid arguments! Let's see what other thinks...
> >>
> >> Jacques
> >>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Hans
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 11:03 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>>> Mmm, Though I remember now Hans's proposition to have the site in the
> >>>> ofbiz repository directly and build everyday. The OFBiz
> >>>> demo
> >>>> instance would then support the http://ofbiz.apache.org/ site
> >>>> I wonder if it's really a good idea. If we get a problem with OFBiz demo
> >>>> instance the site would not be available. I think it's
> >>>> safer to have static pages instead. It's really not hard to maintain.
> >>>>
> >>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will soon remove this application if nobody sees a problem with that.
> >>>> It's totally deprecated now and anyway, even if we
> >>>> update
> >>>> it, we will have to update in the future, etc.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
