[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878691#action_12878691 ]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3703: ---------------------------------------- There was a bug in this: it did not take into account the specific case of extension. I have fixed it at r954583 This bug was in updatePartyContactMech. When you wanted to update only the extension of a phone number it did not get stored. I said "that seems to have been introduced" because it's working in stable demo without changes, so I guess it's related to the change in this issue I also remove a useless couple of lines at the beginning of the updatePartyContactMech service. Finally I must say that I find very weird to have extension in PartyContactMech entity. It would be certainly more logical to have in TelecomNumber. Is it really used for anything else than phone number extension? > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Arun Patidar > Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch, OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.