that works.
I am also aware of the time it takes to do this.
I would be willing to do the grunt work so only the signing is left to-do.
=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin
<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
Adrian Crum sent the following on 6/27/2010 3:01 PM:
I recall Jacopo suggesting monthly updates.
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 6/27/10, Jacques Le Roux<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Sounds reasonable enough IMO +1 (not
sure for point 1 tough, isn'it already a schedule? I can't
remember and have not the courage to
check the wiki :/)
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"<bjf...@free-man.net>
I see two points.
1) yearly if a lot of fixes have been done
2) when Blockers are fixed.
Blockers mean when a bug keeps a user from using
ofbiz.
in this case the Ecommerce forums, blogs are
effected.
=========================
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com<http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1237480&locale=en_US&trk=tab_pro>
Adam Heath sent the following on 6/27/2010 9:19 AM:
BJ Freeman wrote:
this is a release 9.04 (zip) error.
if it has been fixed in the SVN, as Adrian
commented, then we should
vote for a 9.04.1 release since is it a
Blocker for the Release to
function.
We shouldn't do a point release for every
individual fix. But that's
not a hard-fast rule, in my book. It's just
a gut feeling.
