I am sorry Adrian, this is a perfect example of your behavior. This was a request in 2007. introducing widget comments, an excellent request. How can it be, you added this context stuff on may 20 2010? Even on the original request people do not want the web.xml configuration.
Whatever it is: if widget.properties widgetverbose = true i want to see widgets comments enabled everywhere. When false i can accept a compromise it can be overridden by web.xml. However you are not in for compromises so i want to have this override taken out completely, I still did not hear a business benefit for it it it makes the system complicated for apparently no reason. Regards. Hans On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:46 -0700, Adrian Crum wrote: > Hans, > > It would be preferable if you would research this information for yourself, > but I am willing to oblige: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1318 > > -Adrian > > --- On Thu, 7/8/10, Hans Bakker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Hans Bakker <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r961684 - > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 11:33 PM > > Adrian, > > > > can you please give us the business reason why you want the > > widget > > properties setting via widgets.properties and web.xml as > > you implemented > > it? > > > > i really cannot see the benefits from a business point of > > view. The > > disadvantages I already gave you. > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 23:04 -0700, Adrian Crum wrote: > > > Exactly! That's what I have been trying to say all > > along. > > > > > > If Hans copied the Example component to create a new > > project, and the HTML comments were turned off in the > > Example component, then that doesn't mean there was a bug in > > the screen widgets. Instead, there was a problem in the > > settings in Hans' local copy. > > > > > > If we want to turn on HTML comments in the Example > > component, then fine - let's discuss that. But why cripple > > the entire widget HTML comments feature in the process? > > > > > > Btw, I noticed the resources component (which I > > believe generates new components) has widget comments turned > > off. That should be changed so they are on by default. > > > > > > -Adrian > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 7/8/10, David E Jones <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: David E Jones <[email protected]> > > > > Subject: Re: svn commit: r961684 - > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 10:52 PM > > > > > > > > Just because you are fine with how it works > > doesn't mean > > > > others are fine with it, which is usually the > > reason a > > > > discussion starts and discovering such > > differences and > > > > exploring possible resolutions is the point of > > discussions. > > > > > > > > For my part, getting back to the issue, I also > > noticed that > > > > the widget demarcation comments were no longer on > > by default > > > > and I found it somewhat annoying. I don't think > > that the > > > > changes Hans made are the right way to go. In > > fact, I think > > > > how it worked before the round of changes to this > > that were > > > > done before the changes Hans made was the way to > > go, ie: > > > > like most things in OFBiz a default of a more > > > > developer-friendly mode (the demarcation comments > > on) with a > > > > configuration option to make it more > > production-friendly > > > > (demarcation comments off). > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > > > > > > > > > David, > > > > > > > > > > You are missing the point - there was no > > issue. The > > > > code worked fine. > > > > > > > > > > I *have* addressed the issue. The correct > > behavior as > > > > designed was detailed in my first reply. If > > anyone needs > > > > further information they can check the commit > > logs and the > > > > related Jira issue. > > > > > > > > > > Hans had a misconfigured local copy, and he > > didn't > > > > understand why it wasn't working the way it > > should. Instead > > > > of asking for help on the mailing list, he > > arbitrarily > > > > changed the trunk. If anyone else had done the > > same thing > > > > there would be a similar reaction from the > > community. > > > > > > > > > > Hans just admitted he made a mistake in his > > local > > > > copy. Why should the trunk change to fix a > > mistake in > > > > someone's local copy? > > > > > > > > > > If Hans wants to change the design, then > > that's fine - > > > > lets discuss that. But in the meantime the trunk > > is broken. > > > > Hans broke it. I've tried to reason with him and > > asked him > > > > to unbreak it. > > > > > > > > > > What is so hard to understand about that? > > > > > > > > > > -Adrian > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 7/8/10, David E Jones <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> From: David E Jones <[email protected]> > > > > >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r961684 - > > > > > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >> To: [email protected] > > > > >> Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 10:32 PM > > > > >> > > > > >> Adrian, > > > > >> > > > > >> I hate to say it, but it seems like > > these messages > > > > from > > > > >> Hans are presenting the issue and > > attempting to > > > > initiate a > > > > >> discussion on the best way to go > > forward, and your > > > > messages > > > > >> are not discussing the issue and instead > > appealing > > > > to some > > > > >> sort of reason to not change how things > > are at > > > > all. > > > > >> > > > > >> This doesn't seem to be a two-way > > cooperation, so > > > > who is it > > > > >> that you want Hans to cooperate with? > > > > >> > > > > >> -David > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Adrian Crum > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Hans, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> There was no need for a compromise > > because > > > > there was > > > > >> no problem to begin with. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> You just admitted the problem you > > were > > > > experiencing > > > > >> was due to a misconfiguration in your > > local copy. > > > > Your > > > > >> solution to that misconfiguration was to > > change > > > > the trunk. > > > > >> The trunk was not the problem - the > > problem was in > > > > your > > > > >> local copy. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Your changes broke the trunk. Please > > un-break > > > > it. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> If you revert your changes and > > properly > > > > configure your > > > > >> local copy, then everything will work as > > you > > > > expect it to. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Please learn to cooperate. We are a > > community > > > > of peers > > > > >> and things will go smoother if you learn > > to follow > > > > advice. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -Adrian > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> --- On Thu, 7/8/10, Hans Bakker > > <[email protected]> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> From: Hans Bakker <[email protected]> > > > > >>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r961684 > > - > > > > >> > > > > > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>> Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, > > 8:33 PM > > > > >>>> Adrian, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> what i proposed to you was a > > compromise. > > > > You seem > > > > >> to only > > > > >>>> accept your > > > > >>>> way, as happened many times in > > the past. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> therefore i am not in for > > compromises any > > > > more. I > > > > >> would > > > > >>>> like you to > > > > >>>> remove the context code which > > enables the > > > > override > > > > >> in the > > > > >>>> web.xml. It > > > > >>>> makes the system unnecessarily > > complicated > > > > for a > > > > >> feature i > > > > >>>> see no use. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> It also causes to prohibit > > widgets > > > > comments in the > > > > >> example > > > > >>>> component > > > > >>>> which should show comments by > > default to > > > > follow > > > > >> the > > > > >>>> principle to show > > > > >>>> all possibilities in the system > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Regards, > > > > >>>> Hans > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 20:00 > > -0700, Adrian > > > > Crum > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>>>> Hans, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> It's good that you took the > > time to > > > > understand > > > > >> the > > > > >>>> problem. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> What would be acceptable is > > to revert > > > > the > > > > >> changes you > > > > >>>> made so the original behavior is > > restored. > > > > Your > > > > >> first commit > > > > >>>> tried to fix something that > > wasn't broken, > > > > and > > > > >> your second > > > > >>>> commit disables a demonstration > > of how the > > > > widget > > > > >> comments > > > > >>>> can be controlled. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -Adrian > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> --- On Thu, 7/8/10, Hans > > Bakker <[email protected]> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> From: Hans Bakker <[email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: > > r961684 > > > > - > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>> Date: Thursday, July 8, > > 2010, 7:35 > > > > PM > > > > >>>>>> Ok this is what > > happened: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I upgraded ofbiz from > > about 3-4 > > > > weeks ago. > > > > >> Some > > > > >>>> time ago i > > > > >>>>>> created a new > > > > >>>>>> component in hot deploy > > using the > > > > web.xml > > > > >> from > > > > >>>> the example > > > > >>>>>> component. I > > > > >>>>>> see the widget comments > > are not > > > > generated. > > > > >> I > > > > >>>> check > > > > >>>>>> widget.properties and > > > > >>>>>> see the parameter is set > > to true. > > > > I used > > > > >> this > > > > >>>> feature > > > > >>>>>> before and never > > > > >>>>>> had a problem. I see > > that in > > > > >>>> widgetBoundaryCommentsEnabled > > > > >>>>>> class the > > > > >>>>>> 'context stuff' is > > changing true > > > > to > > > > >> false. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I not really see the > > benefit of > > > > this code, > > > > >> why > > > > >>>> would > > > > >>>>>> somebody want to > > > > >>>>>> change this setting by > > the > > > > context > > > > >> content? > > > > >>>> However, as > > > > >>>>>> long as the > > > > >>>>>> parameter in widget > > properties > > > > works, then > > > > >> i am > > > > >>>> fine. So i > > > > >>>>>> made the > > > > >>>>>> change that this > > parameter can > > > > only be > > > > >> overridden > > > > >>>> if the > > > > >>>>>> widget comments > > > > >>>>>> are switched of. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I now see that the > > comments in > > > > the > > > > >> example > > > > >>>> component are > > > > >>>>>> switched off in > > > > >>>>>> web.xml? I also do not > > understand > > > > this, > > > > >>>> especially the > > > > >>>>>> example component > > > > >>>>>> should show comments? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I avoid this confusion > > in the > > > > future I > > > > >> added a > > > > >>>> comment in > > > > >>>>>> widget.properties that > > only > > > > 'false' can > > > > >> be > > > > >>>> overridden and > > > > >>>>>> commented out > > > > >>>>>> the code in web.xml of > > the > > > > example > > > > >> component. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> I expect this should be > > acceptable > > > > to > > > > >> everybody? > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>> Hans > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at > > 00:28 +1200, > > > > Scott > > > > >> Gray > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> Hi Hans, > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Two points: > > > > >>>>>>> 1. Calm down, > > this is > > > > just a > > > > >>>> discussion. > > > > >>>>>> Telling Adrian to look > > at the code > > > > is > > > > >> perfectly > > > > >>>> valid, > > > > >>>>>> getting mad and making > > threats is > > > > not > > > > >>>>>>> 2. You're not > > the first > > > > to > > > > >> mention it > > > > >>>> but I > > > > >>>>>> don't know where this > > idea of a > > > > veto came > > > > >> from, > > > > >>>> it doesn't > > > > >>>>>> exist. When > > required, the > > > > PMC as a > > > > >> group > > > > >>>> can make > > > > >>>>>> binding decisions but > > not > > > > individuals. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> Regards > > > > >>>>>>> Scott > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On 9/07/2010, at > > 12:17 AM, > > > > Hans > > > > >> Bakker > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> please check the > > code > > > > before you > > > > >>>> comment? > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> i changed it > > because the > > > > comments > > > > >> were > > > > >>>> not shown > > > > >>>>>> by default anymore as > > > > >>>>>>>> was originally. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> If you go that > > far , i > > > > will go so > > > > >> far > > > > >>>> and will > > > > >>>>>> use my veto and revert > > > > >>>>>>>> the code that > > added this > > > > context > > > > >> stuff? > > > > >>>> 'true' in > > > > >>>>>> the properties file > > > > >>>>>>>> should always > > show the > > > > widgets > > > > >>>> comments > > > > >>>>>> irrespective of the > > context. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> no wonder there > > aren't > > > > any > > > > >> significant > > > > >>>> changes in > > > > >>>>>> the last few > > > > >>>>>>>> months .... > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>>>>> Hans > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, > > 2010-07-08 at > > > > 04:47 > > > > >> -0700, > > > > >>>> Adrian Crum > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Then you > > should change > > > > the > > > > >>>> description, not > > > > >>>>>> the code. The intended > > behavior > > > > is: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> The > > properties setting > > > > is the > > > > >>>> default, it can > > > > >>>>>> be overridden in the > > web.xml file > > > > >>>> (application-wide > > > > >>>>>> setting), or in the > > context > > > > >> (screen-specific > > > > >>>> setting). > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> -Adrian > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> --- On Thu, > > 7/8/10, > > > > Hans > > > > >> Bakker > > > > >>>> <[email protected]> > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> From: > > Hans Bakker > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: > > Re: svn > > > > commit: > > > > >>>> r961684 - > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > /ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Date: > > Thursday, > > > > July 8, > > > > >> 2010, > > > > >>>> 3:13 AM > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I agree > > with what > > > > the > > > > >>>> description of > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the code > > says at > > > > the top. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> your > > setting makes > > > > that > > > > >> the > > > > >>>>>> widget.verbose by > > default is > > > > >>>>>>>>>> false > > and the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> messages > > are not > > > > shown. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > Regards, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hans > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> P.S. i > > missed the > > > > last > > > > >>>> comments, which > > > > >>>>>> one? > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, > > 2010-07-08 > > > > at > > > > >> 21:54 > > > > >>>> +1200, Scott > > > > >>>>>> Gray wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The > > context > > > > setting > > > > >> should > > > > >>>> override > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > widget.properties > > > > setting, > > > > >> that > > > > >>>> is the > > > > >>>>>> only reason why we > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have a > > context > > > > version of > > > > >> the > > > > >>>> setting. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > Please respond > > > > to this > > > > >> one, > > > > >>>> you > > > > >>>>>> haven't responded to > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > discussion > > > > regarding > > > > >> your > > > > >>>> last commit > > > > >>>>>> yet. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > Regards > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > Scott > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > HotWax Media > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On > > 8/07/2010, > > > > at 9:49 > > > > >> PM, > > > > >>>> [email protected] > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Author: > > > > hansbak > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Date: Thu > > > > >> Jul 8 > > > > >>>> 09:49:57 > > > > >>>>>> 2010 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > New > > > > Revision: > > > > >> 961684 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=961684&view=rev > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Log: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > make > > > > >>>>>> > > widgetBoundaryCommentsEnabled work > > > > as the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > descriptions > > > > states: > > > > >> Widget > > > > >>>> boundary > > > > >>>>>> comments are enabled by > > > > >>>>>>>>>> setting > > > > widgetVerbose true > > > > >> in > > > > >>>> the context > > > > >>>>>> Map, OR by setting > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > widget.verbose=true in > > > > >>>> widget.properties. > > > > >>>>>> And not let the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> context > > override > > > > the > > > > >>>> widget.properties > > > > >>>>>> setting > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Modified: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > Modified: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > URL: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java?rev=961684&r1=961683&r2=961684&view=diff > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > ============================================================================== > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > --- > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > (original) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > +++ > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > ofbiz/trunk/framework/widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/ModelWidget.java > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thu > > Jul 8 > > > > 09:49:57 > > > > >> 2010 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > @@ -21,6 > > > > +21,7 @@ > > > > >>>> package > > > > >>>>>> org.ofbiz.widget; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > import > > > > >>>> java.io.Serializable; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > import > > > > >> java.util.Map; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > import > > > > >>>> org.w3c.dom.Element; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > +import > > > > >>>>>> > > org.ofbiz.base.util.Debug; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > import > > > > >>>>>> > > org.ofbiz.base.util.UtilGenerics; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > import > > > > >>>>>> > > > > org.ofbiz.base.util.UtilProperties; > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > @@ -110,7 > > > > +111,7 > > > > >> @@ > > > > >>>> public class > > > > >>>>>> ModelWidget > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > implements Seri > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>> */ > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >> public > > > > >>>> static > > > > >>>>>> boolean > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >> > > widgetBoundaryCommentsEnabled(Map<String, ? > > > > >>>> extends > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > Object> > > > > context) { > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>>> boolean > > > > >>>>>>>>>> result > > = > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > "true".equals(UtilProperties.getPropertyValue("widget", > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > "widget.verbose")); > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > - > > > > >> > > > > >>>> if > > > > >>>>>> (context != null) > > > > >>>>>>>>>> { > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > + > > > > >> > > > > >>>> if > > > > >>>>>> (result == false > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > && context > > > > != > > > > >> null) { > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > String str = > > > > >>>> (String) > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > context.get(enableBoundaryCommentsParam); > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > if (str != > > > > >>>> null) { > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > result = > > > > >>>>>> "true".equals(str); > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ofbiz on > > twitter: > > > > http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Myself > > on twitter: > > > > http://twitter.com/hansbak > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > Antwebsystems.com: > > > > >> Quality > > > > >>>> services for > > > > >>>>>> competitive rates. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>> Ofbiz on > > twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > > > >>>>>>>> Myself on > > twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > > > >>>>>>>> > > Antwebsystems.com: > > > > Quality > > > > >> services > > > > >>>> for > > > > >>>>>> competitive rates. > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > > > >>>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > > > >>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: > > Quality > > > > services for > > > > >>>> competitive rates. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> -- > > > > >>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > > > >>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > > > >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality > > services for > > > > >> competitive rates. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > > > > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
