That is fine if you let me commit the contactlist upgrades from chattree this week...?
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 10:31 +0100, Bruno Busco wrote: > IMO the complete contactlist package should be moved away from the marketing > component and put in party. > The reason of this is that a contactlist could be used to notify a group of > users of something appening in ANY application. > > This could be also considered for the framework-only installation. > What do you think about? > > Regards, > Bruno > > > 2010/12/14 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net> > > > Contact list can be used for many operations. > > with a many to many relationship then it is achieved with out extra > > entities. > > Unless you are adding other fields then there maybe a reason. > > the model from the data model book is to use enumeration and types to > > define extra info. > > > > just sharing, not against you doing it that way. > > > > > > ========================= > > BJ Freeman > > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < > > http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> > > Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> > > Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist > > > > Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man > > > > > > Ean Schuessler sent the following on 12/13/2010 4:10 PM: > > > > MarketingCampaignContactList makes more sense to me. > >> > >> It seems in line with tables such as PartyContactMech or > >> ProductStoreCatalog. > >> > >> On 12/13/10 10:33, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> > >>> the appl as I understand it is a many to many interface. > >>> to my knowledge no one has discussed migration, in detail, as an > >>> (semi)automated process but I think it would be a good thread. > >>> > >> > >> > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
