James,
It's quite clear, and IMO you did an excellent and interesting work.
Unfortunately, I don't know if we will find enough interest in
the community to commit your patch. Mostly because it's a bit redundant and not exactly in the spirit of OFBiz (less compilations
and reboots).
BTW why was the reason you created this component (apart that maybe you are a
huge fan of wicket ;o), did you miss something in
OFBiz?
Thanks
Jacques
From: "james_sg" <snowme...@hotmail.com>
Hi Jacques,
Ok, I agree one con about it, is maintenance.
The reason is because the screen renderer in OFBiz is tightly coupled with
the screen definition.
Since this implementation is a quick hack, I go with the easier way of
coding the screen content in java instead of using the screen definition
way.
It will be good if OFbiz add a layer of POJOs between screen widgets and the
renderer.
Hope I am clear.
Regards,
james
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi devs,
James yong submitted a patch (simple enough to be quickly read) proposing
to introduce Wicket as an OFBiz framework component. I's
be interested to read your comments about pros and cons
Note the urlrewrite stuff...
One cons I see is maintenance... (We will see if James is still around, he
created the Jira issue in August)
Thanks
Jacques
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-in-OFBiz-tp3233945p3234277.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
