Hi Marco,
I have tried the following patch locally and I get a lot of warnings.
Index: applications/order/build.xml
===================================================================
--- applications/order/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ applications/order/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
<javac16>
<!-- exclude the payment processor packages; comment if you have libs
-->
<exclude name="org/ofbiz/order/thirdparty/taxware/**"/>
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
</javac16>
</target>
Index: common.xml
===================================================================
--- common.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ common.xml (working copy)
@@ -90,7 +90,9 @@
<!-- ================================================================== -->
<target name="classes" depends="prepare">
- <javac16/>
+ <javac16>
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
+ </javac16>
</target>
<target name="jar" depends="classes">
Index: framework/base/build.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/base/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ framework/base/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -87,7 +87,9 @@
</target>
<target name="classes" depends="prepare,gen-src">
- <javac16/>
+ <javac16>
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
+ </javac16>
</target>
<target name="jar" depends="classes">
Index: framework/bi/build.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/bi/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ framework/bi/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@
<!-- ================================================================== -->
<target name="classes" depends="prepare">
- <javac16 classpathref="local.class.path"/>
+ <javac16 classpathref="local.class.path">
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
+ </javac16>
</target>
</project>
Index: framework/sql/build.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/sql/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ framework/sql/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -61,7 +61,9 @@
</target>
<target name="classes" depends="prepare,gen-src">
- <javac16/>
+ <javac16>
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
+ </javac16>
</target>
<target name="jar" depends="classes">
Index: framework/start/build.xml
===================================================================
--- framework/start/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ framework/start/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,10 @@
<target name="classes" depends="prepare">
<!-- compile start -->
- <javac16 destdir="${build.dir}/classes" srcdir="${src.dir}"/>
+ <javac16 destdir="${build.dir}/classes" srcdir="${src.dir}">
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
+ </javac16>
+
</target>
<target name="jar" depends="classes">
Index: specialpurpose/build.xml
===================================================================
--- specialpurpose/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ specialpurpose/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
projectmgr/build.xml,
ldap/build.xml,
crowd/build.xml,
+ webui/build.xml,
googlecheckout/build.xml"/>
<!-- For the Web POS add "webpos/build.xml" to the list above -->
<!-- For the old OFBiz Workflow Engine add "workflow/build.xml" to the list
above -->
Index: specialpurpose/shark/build.xml
===================================================================
--- specialpurpose/shark/build.xml (revision 1081008)
+++ specialpurpose/shark/build.xml (working copy)
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
<target name="classes" depends="prepare">
<javac16>
<src path="${src.dir}"/>
+ <compilerarg value="-Xlint"/>
</javac16>
</target>
I wanted to commit it, but now I prefer to share this experience and discuss
about it
BTW I'm not quire sure about your question below
Thanks
Jacques
From: <risali...@gmail.com>
Hi dev,
I'm near to complete big work of cleaning of all OFBiz classes from warning of
during compiling java classes.
Actually with the default configuration of Eclipse only 1 warning is still
active:
The resource is a duplicate of applications/securityext/src/META-INF/services/org.ofbiz.security.authz.da.DynamicAccessHandler and
was not copied to the output folder /ofbiz/framework/security/src/META-INF/services
org.ofbiz.security.authz.da.DynamicAccessHandler
Someone knows if it's necessary and how to fix it ?
Thanks in advance
Marco