[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13215192#comment-13215192
]
Anne Jessel commented on OFBIZ-4709:
------------------------------------
Thanks everyone for the comments. I like the direction this is heading.
I think the treatment of contentTypeId needs more work. Currently this has
values such as ANNOTATION, DECORATOR, TOPIC. Adding JCR_CONTENT_ANNOTATION and
similar would make it difficult to find all the ANNOTATION content. Perhaps we
should add an extra field to Content, called storageTypeId? It could have two
possible values (at this stage) ENTITY or JCR, with default being ENTITY for
backwards compatability.
Also, Content entity doesn't currently have from/thruDate fields. I'll need to
add those.
> Support jcr-stored file content within Applications
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-4709
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4709
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ALL APPLICATIONS
> Affects Versions: SVN trunk
> Reporter: Anne Jessel
> Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
>
> My current requirements:
> * store uploaded documents (pdf and scans), mainly for legal compliance
> reasons
> * old document versions should be accessible
> * documents should be associated with existing entities. So far I've
> identified a need to associate with Product, Party, OrderHeader,
> ShipmentItem, probably InventoryItemDetail and maybe WorkEffort. I would not
> be surprised if we discover more as this project proceeds.
> * documents may have a type and a purpose, though sometimes I'm not sure of
> the difference. For example, type: drivers_licence might be purpose:
> identification, and/or purpose: permission_to_drive, while type:
> shipping_label would be purpose: shipping_label
> * many documents have an expiry date (e.g. drivers licence)
> * a document may become invalid before its expiry date (e.g. because the law
> changed)
> * a specific version of a document may need to be associated with an entity.
> For example, a licence agreement document accessed via a Product should
> always be the latest version. However the version of that document actually
> shipped with the product should be associated with the ShipmentItem.
> * a single document might be associated with more than one entity type: see
> the example in the previous point
> Not all documents require all of the above. For example, there are some
> documents where we don't need to track which version was used when, and some
> without expiry dates.
> I'm thinking of using the from/thruDate pattern to handle expiry related
> needs. I'd like to put as much information into the jcr path as possible, so
> less needs to go into entities, as per Sascha's suggestion on the dev ML.
> However (at least) from/thruDate and which version of a document was actually
> used where will presumably need to be stored in an entity.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
