+1

2012/2/23 Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>

> +1
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> 2012/2/23 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>
> > +1
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappellato@**hotwaxmedia.com<
> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> > >
> >
> >  This is the vote thread to release a new (bug fix) release for the 09.04
> >> branch. This new release, "Apache OFBiz 09.04.02" (major release number:
> >> "09.04"; minor release number: "02"), will supersede the release "Apache
> >> OFBiz 09.04.01".
> >>
> >> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~**jacopoc/dist/<
> http://people.apache.org/~jacopoc/dist/>
> >>
> >> and are:
> >>
> >> * apache-ofbiz-09.04.02.zip: the release package, based on the 09.04
> >> branch at revision 1291780 (latest as of now)
> >> * KEYS: text file with keys
> >> * apache-ofbiz-09.04.02.zip.asc: the detached signature file
> >> * apache-ofbiz-09.04.02.zip.md5, apache-ofbiz-09.04.02.zip.sha: hashes
> >>
> >> Please download and test the zip file and its signatures (for
> >> instructions on testing the signatures see
> http://www.apache.org/info/**
> >> verification.html <http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html>).
> >>
> >> Vote:
> >>
> >> [ +1] release as Apache OFBiz 09.04.02
> >> [ -1] do not release
> >>
> >> This vote will be closed in 72 hours.
> >> For more details about this process please read
> http://www.apache.org/**
> >> foundation/voting.html <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>
> >>
> >> The following text is quoted from the above url:
> >> "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
> approval
> >> -- i.e. at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release,
> and
> >> there must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> >> vetoed. Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone
> >> identifies serious problems, but in most cases the ultimate decision,
> lies
> >> with the individual serving as release manager."
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to