I was thinking to use another generic security check based on a naming convention (e.g. a security service with entity name and something).
Jacopo On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > What permission checks would be performed? > > -Adrian > > > On 3/7/2012 2:53 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> I am resurrecting the initial thread when the "entity-auto" engine was >> implemented; this is a great addition but we could even push it at a further >> level (again following the "configuration by exception" strategy): >> why don't we make it optional the service definition for crud services? >> The idea is that, if I call: >> >> Map result = dispatcher.runSync("createExampleEntityName", >> UtilMisc.toMap(...)); >> >> and the system can't find a service definition for createExampleEntityName >> but it finds an entity definition for "ExampleEntityName" then it calls the >> "entity-auto" service for it. >> Of course same applies to create/update/delete. >> >> At that point, as soon as we define an entity we will also have >> automatically the CRUD services. >> >> Jacopo >>