Hi Jacopo, I have the same issue when doing the tests locally.
Regards, Pierre Op 10 april 2012 14:34 schreef Jacopo Cappellato < [email protected]> het volgende: > It may be completely unrelated to this... but I have two tests failing > now; does it work for you? It could be as I am doing some local tests > > Jacopo > > On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > Pierre, > > > > I think you did not get my point. I don't want to restrict the use of > the Geronimo approach I suggested (please read > > http://markmail.org/message/i4u5pijlclgtzwrm as I said in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794) to the test-containers. > > But want to be able to use it on all ports (like also url.properties and > so on) > > > > For the Geronimo we need to use ports below 10000 since we will add > 10000 to 50000 with this approach (having at most 5 instances of > > OFBiz and test on the same machine seems acceptable to me). > > So I suggest you to randomly pick some other ports for your own setting. > > > > If you see another way of doing (like proposed in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4763 following > > http://markmail.org/message/mgmhrqchjjmo776q) please share your > thoughts; > > > > We could have a specific shift for the test component for instance, like > +28 or what not. Would be better to quickly find a right > > setting for all ports than +1 harcoded like I did or +10000 like you > did.... Then please contribute the mechanism, because your > > OFBIZ-4794 patch would prevent the generalised Geronimo way, as I see it > (ie +10000 to +50000, max 5 instances ) ... > > > > I must say I did not put a lot of thoughts in this yet. There are maybe > more clever ways of doing, I just picked the easiest one > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]> > >> Hi Jacques, > >> > >> What annoyed me was that you bluntly upped the port numbers in > >> test-containers.xml with +1, while I was under the impression that we > were > >> still discussing what ports to use. Especially when you mentioned in a > >> previous message the Geronimo approach. Which is totally suitable for > me. > >> > >> Unfortunately, now I see a lot of statements in my Jenkins build jobs > that > >> ports 8010,9081 and 8445 are already in use by other application > servers. > >> Like many others I also have these these ports used by other servers. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Pierre > >> > >> Op 10 april 2012 12:16 schreef Jacques Le Roux < > [email protected] > >>> het volgende: > >> > >>> Mmm sorry Pierre, > >>> > >>> Not sure to get you, does something annoy you there? I'm open for > >>> discussion, of course... > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> From: "Pierre Smits" <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Jee, Jacques, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for seeking consensus and NOT pushing your own agenda! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Op 9 april 2012 15:08 schreef <[email protected]> het volgende: > >>>> > >>>> Author: jleroux > >>>>> Date: Mon Apr 9 13:08:37 2012 > >>>>> New Revision: 1311214 > >>>>> > >>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1311214&view=rev< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1311214&view=rev> > >>>>> Log: > >>>>> Adds 1 to all ports in order to be able to run concurrently an OFBiz > >>>>> instance and a test instance on the same machine. > >>>>> > >>>>> This closes "set different ports for testing in a CI environment > (e.g. > >>>>> Jenkins)" https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794> > >>>>> > >>>>> Modified: > >>>>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml > >>>>> > >>>>> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml > >>>>> URL: > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/** > >>>>> config/test-containers.xml?**rev=1311214&r1=1311213&r2=** > >>>>> 1311214&view=diff< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/config/test-containers.xml?rev=1311214&r1=1311213&r2=1311214&view=diff > > > >>>>> > >>>>> ==============================**==============================** > >>>>> ================== > >>>>> --- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml > (original) > >>>>> +++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/**config/test-containers.xml Mon Apr > 9 > >>>>> 13:08:37 2012 > >>>>> @@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ under the License. > >>>>> > >>>>> <!-- load the naming (JNDI) server --> > >>>>> <container name="naming-container" > >>>>> class="org.ofbiz.base.**container.**NamingServiceContainer"> > >>>>> - <property name="port" value="1099"/> > >>>>> + <property name="port" value="1100"/> > >>>>> </container> > >>>>> > >>>>> <!-- RMI Service Dispatcher --> > >>>>> <container name="rmi-dispatcher" > >>>>> class="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**RmiServiceContainer"> > >>>>> <property name="bound-name" value="RMIDispatcher"/> > >>>>> <property name="bound-host" value="127.0.0.1"/> > >>>>> - <property name="bound-port" value="1099"/> > >>>>> + <property name="bound-port" value="1100"/> > >>>>> <property name="delegator-name" value="test"/> > >>>>> <property name="client-factory" > >>>>> value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**socket.ssl.**SSLClientSocketFactory"/> > >>>>> <property name="server-factory" > >>>>> value="org.ofbiz.service.rmi.**socket.ssl.**SSLServerSocketFactory"/> > >>>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ under the License. > >>>>> <property name="admin-user" value="system"/> > >>>>> <property name="admin-pass" value="ofbiz"/> > >>>>> <property name="iiop-host" value="127.0.0.1"/> > >>>>> - <property name="iiop-port" value="2000"/> > >>>>> + <property name="iiop-port" value="2001"/> > >>>>> </container> > >>>>> --> > >>>>> > >>>>> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ under the License. > >>>>> <property name="maxSpareThreads" value="50"/> > >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="200"/> > >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> > >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8009"/> > >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8010"/> > >>>>> <property name="tcpNoDelay" value="true"/> > >>>>> <property name="soTimeout" value="60000"/> > >>>>> <property name="tomcatAuthentication" value="true"/> > >>>>> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ under the License. > >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> > >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> > >>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> > >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8080"/> > >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8081"/> > >>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> > >>>>> <property name="server" value=""/> > >>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> > >>>>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ under the License. > >>>>> <property name="maxThreads" value="100"/> > >>>>> <property name="minSpareThreads" value="4"/> > >>>>> <property name="noCompressionUserAgents" value=""/> > >>>>> - <property name="port" value="8443"/> > >>>>> + <property name="port" value="8444"/> > >>>>> <property name="restrictedUserAgents" value=""/> > >>>>> <property name="server" value=""/> > >>>>> <property name="socketBuffer" value="9000"/> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >
