ah ah, you are right Vikas! Please disregard the proposal about 09.04.03... I probably need another coffee
Jacopo On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Vikas Mayur wrote: > Jacopo, > > Since 09.04.02 was the last release of the series 09.04, does the proposed > new version 09.04.03 has any purpose? > > Regards > Vikas > > On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >> I would like to perform the following maintenance >> >> 1) "archive" the following versions (they will disappears from drop down >> when tasks are created): >> Release 09.04 >> Release 09.04.01 >> Release 10.04 >> because they are all for superseded releases; if there are open issues >> assigned ("affects") to them we could bulk move them to versions "Release >> Branch 09.04" and "Release Branch 10.04" >> >> 2) create new versions (for upcoming releases): >> Release 09.04.03 >> Release 10.04.03 >> however new bugs should always be reported ("affect") against the "Release >> Branch 09.04", "Release Branch 10.04" and "Release Branch 11.04" ; we could >> use the "Release 09.04.03" and "Release 10.04.03" when the task is fixed in >> the branch as the "fixed in" version. >> >> I think that #1 is rather important; I am not sure about #2. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Jacopo >> >> PS: I have also created "Release 11.04.01" with a tentative release date of >> May 15: I am going to use this version to log a series of tasks that are >> required before the release; after the release I will "archive" this version >> as the versions in #2 above. >> >