Ashish is already aware, Adrian noticed it.  I guess,  Ashish will not revert 
but use the right corresponding level...

Jacques
PS: top posted because closing the thread

From: "Adam Heath" <doo...@brainfood.com>
On 05/10/2012 11:46 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Fri May 11 04:46:26 2012
New Revision: 1337024

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337024&view=rev
Log:
Applied similar fix as we did on trunk r1300463.
On production systems you can't suppress Debug.log( message by the use of debug.properties file. It is always good to use Debug.* statements that are having log level setup in debug.properties file. The real problem comes with Debug.log( statement when you are printing any list or map object that contains so many records(or data) in it. Here I am changing all the occurrence of Debug.log( with Debug.logInfo(, Debug.logError( or Debug.logWarning( so that we can have better control of Debug.* statements on production system. :-)

Bad use of Debug statement. On production system you will get false alarm that you are having error in code base although the resultant statement is only giving additional information instead of error message.

If conditional check is used for some debug level lets say "Verbose" then the containing Debug statement will be Debug.logVerbose() instead of Debug.logInfo() - Comment from Jacopo and Adrian.

Modified:
     
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/clearcommerce/CCPaymentServices.java
     ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/HttpClient.java
     
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webapp/src/org/ofbiz/webapp/event/ServiceEventHandler.java
     
ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/shark/src/org/ofbiz/shark/audit/EntityAuditMgr.java
     
ofbiz/trunk/specialpurpose/shark/src/org/ofbiz/shark/instance/EntityPersistentMgr.java

Modified: 
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/clearcommerce/CCPaymentServices.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/clearcommerce/CCPaymentServices.java?rev=1337024&r1=1337023&r2=1337024&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/clearcommerce/CCPaymentServices.java
 (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/thirdparty/clearcommerce/CCPaymentServices.java Fri May 11 04:46:26 2012
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ public class CCPaymentServices {

          Map<String, Object>  pbOrder = 
UtilGenerics.checkMap(context.get("pbOrder"));
          if (pbOrder != null) {
-            if (Debug.verboseOn()) Debug.logInfo("pbOrder Map not empty:" + 
pbOrder.toString(),module);
+            if (Debug.verboseOn()) Debug.logVerbose("pbOrder Map not empty:" + 
pbOrder.toString(),module);
Element pbOrderElement = UtilXml.addChildElement(orderFormDocElement, "PbOrder", requestDocument); // periodic billing order UtilXml.addChildElementValue(pbOrderElement, "OrderFrequencyCycle", (String) pbOrder.get("OrderFrequencyCycle"), requestDocument); Element interval = UtilXml.addChildElementValue(pbOrderElement, "OrderFrequencyInterval", (String) pbOrder.get("OrderFrequencyInterval"), requestDocument);

Modified: ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/HttpClient.java
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/HttpClient.java?rev=1337024&r1=1337023&r2=1337024&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/HttpClient.java 
(original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/HttpClient.java Fri May 
11 04:46:26 2012
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ public class HttpClient {
                  }
              }

-            if (Debug.verboseOn() || debug) Debug.logInfo("Content-Type: " + 
contentType, module);
+            if (Debug.verboseOn() || debug) Debug.logVerbose("Content-Type: " 
+ contentType, module);

Er, no.  The '|| debug' means that this is not a normal situation. Don't change 
it in this case.

(there are other similar changes that I removed from the email, please revert)

Reply via email to