Wrong. An existing database has data in the serviceName field, not in the oldServiceName field.

-Adrian

On 8/31/2012 4:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes, the point is Nicolas is using the col-name="service_name" trick in

+ <field name="oldServiceName" type="long-varchar" col-name="service_name"> + <description>Deprecated : use customMethod pattern instead of. Keep for backward compatibility</description>
+      </field>

So no migration tool is needed, it's done automatically. What others think, should Nicolas really provide a migration script?

Jacques

From: "Nicolas Malin" <malin.nico...@librenberry.net>
Le 31/08/2012 15:18, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I think you are missing the point. Documenting the change is fine, but there should be a migration path. This commit just ignores existing data. In other words, the commit should include a service that copies data in the deleted field to the new structure.
Sorry adrian, I'm not agree. This commit has been validate on existing data with template content fusion without data migration. I have spot the backward compatibility.

[Quote]
On my initial proposition, I keep serviceName on oldServiceName for transparent evolution without script migration. An other solution will be convert all serviceName present on Content to customMethod data by conversion script. If you prefer a complete migration (exclude serviceName from services), I can correct it today.
[/Quote]

I open to all suggestion. I reopen the issue to correct the fulfillDigitalItems order process raised by Scott, I wait the run-tests end.

Nicolas

And no, if there is a problem with your commit, YOU should revert it.

-Adrian

On 8/31/2012 1:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
You can revert if you want, I thought documenting in wiki would be enough as we did before

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
The problem with this commit is it hurts existing users because their data is being ignored (or thrown away).

-Adrian

On 8/31/2012 12:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes, I wondered about using both also. I asked Nicolas to clarify at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBTECH/Revisions+Requiring+Data+Migration+%28upgrade+ofbiz%29

It would be really easy to have both and could then simply documented by a sentence.
But do we want to keep the old way? The new way allow more...

Nicolas asked opinions at http://markmail.org/message/uqbvio76dulkzvnd BJ suggested both...

Jacques

From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
Why can't we use both? What happens to users who are using the serviceName field? Is there a migration service?

-Adrian

On 8/31/2012 10:55 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Aug 31 09:55:34 2012
New Revision: 1379389

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1379389&view=rev
Log:
A patch from Nicolas Malin "change serviceName by customMethod on Content " https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5020

When you used a content as template, the content.serviceName value used to call the context populate service before rendering. I propose to replace serviceName field by customMethodId and use customMethod pattern for more flexibility. serviceName field is renamed to oldServiceName field for backward compatibility


Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/script/org/ofbiz/content/ContentManagementMapProcessors.xml ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/content/ContentWorker.java

Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=1379389&r1=1379388&r2=1379389&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Fri Aug 31 09:55:34 2012
@@ -159,7 +159,10 @@ under the License.
        <field name="dataSourceId" type="id"></field>
        <field name="statusId" type="id"></field>
        <field name="privilegeEnumId" type="id"></field>
-      <field name="serviceName" type="long-varchar"></field>
+ <field name="oldServiceName" type="long-varchar" col-name="service_name"> + <description>Deprecated : use customMethod pattern instead of. Keep for backward compatibility</description>
+      </field>
+      <field name="customMethodId" type="id"></field>
        <field name="contentName" type="name"></field>
        <field name="description" type="description"></field>
        <field name="localeString" type="very-short"></field>
@@ -187,6 +190,9 @@ under the License.
<relation type="one" fk-name="CONTENT_PRIVENM" title="Privilege" rel-entity-name="Enumeration"> <key-map field-name="privilegeEnumId" rel-field-name="enumId"/>
        </relation>
+ <relation type="one" fk-name="CONTENT_CUSTMET" rel-entity-name="CustomMethod">
+        <key-map field-name="customMethodId"/>
+      </relation>
<!-- the relationship to MimeType is one-nofk so that you can still do a lookup on MimeType but a new and unexpected mime type would not cause a foreign key constraint violation, so MimeType can store the most common mime types instead of an exhaustive list of all possible mime types -->

Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/script/org/ofbiz/content/ContentManagementMapProcessors.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/script/org/ofbiz/content/ContentManagementMapProcessors.xml?rev=1379389&r1=1379388&r2=1379389&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/script/org/ofbiz/content/ContentManagementMapProcessors.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/script/org/ofbiz/content/ContentManagementMapProcessors.xml Fri Aug 31 09:55:34 2012
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ under the License.
<process field="dataResourceId"><copy to-field="dataResourceId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="dataSourceId"><copy to-field="dataSourceId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="statusId"><copy to-field="statusId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> - <process field="serviceName"><copy to-field="serviceName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> + <process field="customMethodId"><copy to-field="customMethodId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> + <process field="oldServiceName"><copy to-field="oldServiceName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="contentName"><copy to-field="contentName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="description"><copy to-field="description" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="localeString"><copy to-field="localeString" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process>
@@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ under the License.
<process field="dataResourceId"><copy to-field="dataResourceId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="dataSourceId"><copy to-field="dataSourceId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="statusId"><copy to-field="statusId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> - <process field="serviceName"><copy to-field="serviceName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> + <process field="customMethodId"><copy to-field="customMethodId" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> + <process field="oldServiceName"><copy to-field="oldServiceName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="contentName"><copy to-field="contentName" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="description"><copy to-field="description" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process> <process field="localeString"><copy to-field="localeString" replace="true" set-if-null="false"/></process>

Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/content/ContentWorker.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/content/ContentWorker.java?rev=1379389&r1=1379388&r2=1379389&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/content/ContentWorker.java (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/src/org/ofbiz/content/content/ContentWorker.java Fri Aug 31 09:55:34 2012
@@ -177,7 +177,10 @@ public class ContentWorker implements or
Map<String,Object>templateContext, Locale locale, String mimeTypeId, boolean cache, List<GenericValue> webAnalytics) throws GeneralException, IOException {
          // if the content has a service attached run the service
  -        String serviceName = content.getString("serviceName");
+ //search serviceName to call on associate customMethod and if empty get value from old serviceName field
+        String serviceName = content.getString("oldServiceName");
+ GenericValue custMethod = content.getRelatedOne("CustomMethod", true); + if (custMethod != null) serviceName = custMethod.getString("customMethodName"); if (dispatcher != null && UtilValidate.isNotEmpty(serviceName)) { DispatchContext dctx = dispatcher.getDispatchContext(); ModelService service = dctx.getModelService(serviceName);







--
Nicolas MALIN
Consultant
Tél : 06.17.66.40.06
Site projet : http://www.neogia.org/
-------
Société LibrenBerry
Tél : 02.48.02.56.12
Site : http://www.librenberry.net/


Reply via email to